Compare towns

Peacham vs Proctor vs Reading vs Ripton

Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.

What stands out worked out from the figures below

Peacham has the most renters (23.9% rent).
Proctor has the most affordable homes ($210k median).
Reading has the oldest population (median age 51.1).
Ripton has grown the fastest since 2010 (+25.7%).

What matters to you?

Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.

MeasurePeachamProctorReadingRipton
People
Population
887
1,794Highest
699
508Lowest
Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census
-2.3%Lowest
VT: +2.8%
+1.3%
VT: +2.8%
+3.2%
VT: +2.8%
+25.7%Highest
VT: +2.8%
Median age
50.1±5.7
16% above VT
42.4±6.4Lowest
about the VT average
51.1±7.6Highest
19% above VT
47.7±14.2
11% above VT
Reading and Peacham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Kids under 18
20.7%±6
VT: 17.9%
21.8%±4.4Highest
VT: 17.9%
18.5%±4.2
VT: 17.9%
11.8%±6.3Lowest
VT: 17.9%
Proctor and Peacham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Age 65+
33.6%±2.6Highest
VT: 21.4%
22.4%±2.5Lowest
VT: 21.4%
28.2%±3.3
VT: 21.4%
30.5%±7.1
VT: 21.4%
Peacham and Ripton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+
48.9%Highest
VT: 43.8%
28.1%Lowest
VT: 43.8%
46%
VT: 43.8%
48%
VT: 43.8%
Enrolled in collegeshare of residents
5.4%±4
VT: 7%
3.6%±1.7
VT: 7%
3.1%±2.5Lowest
VT: 7%
20.1%±6.3Highest
VT: 7%
Cost of living
Household incomemedian
$90,000±$28k
11% above VT
$74,167±$12kLowest
9% below VT
$85,000±$19k
5% above VT
$112,917±$15kHighest
39% above VT
Ripton and Peacham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Home valuemedian, owner-occupied
$302,000±$64k
5% below VT
$209,900±$17kLowest
34% below VT
$377,200±$72k
19% above VT
$394,400±$61kHighest
25% above VT
Ripton and Reading are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Rentmedian gross, monthly
$1,028±$248Lowest
17% below VT
$1,029±$202
17% below VT
$1,100±$331Highest
11% below VT
—
Reading and Proctor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Property taxmedian, yearly
$5,605
11% above VT
$4,032Lowest
20% below VT
$5,754Highest
14% above VT
$4,915
about the VT average
Renters paying 30%+of income on rent
66.7%±17.7Highest
VT: 48.4%
37.3%±16.2Lowest
VT: 48.4%
63.3%±31.7
VT: 48.4%
52.9%±100
VT: 48.4%
Peacham and Reading are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Below poverty line
10.6%
VT: 10.1%
16.2%Highest
VT: 10.1%
8.4%Lowest
VT: 10.1%
8.6%
VT: 10.1%
Housing
Homeownersof occupied homes
76.1%Lowest
VT: 73.2%
86.7%
VT: 73.2%
84.9%
VT: 73.2%
90.9%Highest
VT: 73.2%
Typical home builtmedian year
1976Highest
same as VT
1938Lowest
38 yrs older than VT
1969
7 yrs older than VT
1973
3 yrs older than VT
Getting to work
Average commuteone way
31 min
31% above VT
22 minLowest
6% below VT
33 minHighest
41% above VT
24 min
about the VT average
Work from home
24.2%±16.9Highest
VT: 16.9%
9.4%±4.6Lowest
VT: 16.9%
22.9%±10.6
VT: 16.9%
17.2%±8.7
VT: 16.9%
Peacham and Reading are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Schools
School district Peacham School District Quarry Valley Unified Union School District #70 Mountain Views Unified Union School District #76 Addison Central Unified Union School District #55
High school in town None in town Proctor Junior/Senior High School None in town None in town
Students per teacherat that high school —
8.7
— —
On TownTapestry
Old photos in History None yet None yet None yet None yet

VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.