Compare towns
Durham vs Springfield vs Warner
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against New Hampshire.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Durham has grown the fastest since 2010 (+5.8%).
Springfield has the most homeowners (90.7%).
Warner has the most kids (17.3% under 18).
Durham is a college town. 55.1% of residents are enrolled in college, which pulls its median age, poverty rate and renter figures away from what a year-round family would see.
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Durham | Springfield | Warner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 15,080Highest |
1,122Lowest |
2,959 |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +5.8%Highest NH: +4.6% |
-4%Lowest NH: +4.6% |
+3.7% NH: +4.6% |
| Median age | 20.8±0.3Lowest 52% below NH |
51.4±8.8Highest 19% above NH |
43.7±4 about the NH average |
| Springfield and Warner are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 10.3%±2.1Lowest NH: 18.2% |
15.1%±8 NH: 18.2% |
17.3%±3.3Highest NH: 18.2% |
| Warner and Springfield are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 11.5%±1.6Lowest NH: 20.1% |
19.8%±1.6 NH: 20.1% |
20.4%±3.5Highest NH: 20.1% |
| Warner and Springfield are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 75.4%Highest NH: 40.6% |
36.4%Lowest NH: 40.6% |
42.4% NH: 40.6% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 55.1%±3.2Highest NH: 6% |
0%±1.5Lowest NH: 6% |
5.3%±1.6 NH: 6% |
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $124,056±$21kHighest 25% above NH |
$100,893±$19k about the NH average |
$94,022±$18kLowest 5% below NH |
| Durham and Springfield are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $504,300±$41kHighest 25% above NH |
$384,100±$50k 5% below NH |
$353,100±$22kLowest 12% below NH |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,429±$143Highest 4% below NH |
$1,096±$217Lowest 26% below NH |
$1,219±$123 18% below NH |
| Durham and Warner are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $10,000+Highest at least 50% above NH |
$5,946Lowest 11% below NH |
$7,650 15% above NH |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 66.4%±16Highest NH: 48.2% |
25.9%±64.8Lowest NH: 48.2% |
48.7%±21.3 NH: 48.2% |
| Durham and Warner are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 15.1%Highest NH: 7.2% |
3.4%Lowest NH: 7.2% |
8.4% NH: 7.2% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 64.4%Lowest NH: 72.8% |
90.7%Highest NH: 72.8% |
74.6% NH: 72.8% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1981 2 yrs newer than NH |
1985Highest 6 yrs newer than NH |
1975Lowest 4 yrs older than NH |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 19 minLowest 27% below NH |
34 minHighest 29% above NH |
32 min 19% above NH |
| Work from home | 19.4%±3.5Highest NH: 16.8% |
16.7%±11.6 NH: 16.8% |
16.6%±4.8Lowest NH: 16.8% |
| Durham and Springfield are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #9 of 120 in NH | — | — |
| School district | Oyster River Coop School District | — | Kearsarge Regional School District |
| High school in town | Oyster River High School | — | None in town |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 12.3 |
— | — |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | 51 photos → | None yet | None yet |
NH average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.