Compare towns
Durham vs Newmarket vs Windsor
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Durham has the youngest population (median age 20.8).
Windsor has the most affordable homes ($170k median).
Durham is a college town. 55.1% of residents are enrolled in college, which pulls its median age, poverty rate and renter figures away from what a year-round family would see.
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Durham | Newmarket | Windsor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 15,080Highest |
9,463 |
2,060Lowest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +5.8%Highest U.S.: +7.4% |
+5.5% U.S.: +7.4% |
+3.5%Lowest U.S.: +7.4% |
| Median age | 20.8±0.3Lowest 47% below U.S. |
41.2±1.9 6% above U.S. |
44.6±12.3Highest 15% above U.S. |
| Windsor and Newmarket are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 10.3%±2.1Lowest U.S.: 22% |
15.6%±2.7 U.S.: 22% |
21.1%±8.8Highest U.S.: 22% |
| Windsor and Newmarket are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 11.5%±1.6Lowest U.S.: 17.2% |
16.1%±2.8 U.S.: 17.2% |
29.2%±8Highest U.S.: 17.2% |
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 75.4%Highest U.S.: 35.7% |
49.7% U.S.: 35.7% |
40%Lowest U.S.: 35.7% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 55.1%±3.2Highest U.S.: 6.4% |
5.6%±1.9 U.S.: 6.4% |
1.2%±1.4Lowest U.S.: 6.4% |
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $124,056±$21kHighest 54% above U.S. |
$100,845±$13k 25% above U.S. |
$51,197±$4kLowest 37% below U.S. |
| Durham and Newmarket are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $504,300±$41kHighest 52% above U.S. |
$455,000±$22k 37% above U.S. |
$170,300±$22kLowest 49% below U.S. |
| Durham and Newmarket are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,429±$143 about the U.S. average |
$1,671±$69Highest 18% above U.S. |
$1,002±$107Lowest 29% below U.S. |
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $10,000+Highest at least 221% above U.S. |
$8,734 180% above U.S. |
$4,878Lowest 56% above U.S. |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 66.4%±16Highest U.S.: 51.1% |
46.3%±8.3 U.S.: 51.1% |
31.4%±20Lowest U.S.: 51.1% |
| Durham and Newmarket are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 15.1%Highest U.S.: 12.5% |
4.6%Lowest U.S.: 12.5% |
7.8% U.S.: 12.5% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 64.4%Highest U.S.: 65.2% |
52.9% U.S.: 65.2% |
51.6%Lowest U.S.: 65.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1981 1 yr newer than U.S. |
1983Highest 3 yrs newer than U.S. |
1938Lowest 42 yrs older than U.S. |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 19 minLowest 27% below U.S. |
28 minHighest 7% above U.S. |
22 min 16% below U.S. |
| Work from home | 19.4%±3.5Highest U.S.: 15.1% |
17.3%±3.3 U.S.: 15.1% |
6.6%±4.7Lowest U.S.: 15.1% |
| Durham and Newmarket are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #9 of 120 in NH | #39 of 120 in NH | #61 of 70 in VT |
| School district | Oyster River Coop School District | Newmarket School District | — |
| High school in town | Oyster River High School | Newmarket Jr.-Sr. High School | — |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 12.3Highest |
9.9Lowest |
— |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | 51 photos → | None yet | None yet |
U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.