Compare towns
Worcester vs Windsor vs Randolph
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Worcester has the most people working from home (23.6%).
Windsor has grown the fastest since 2010 (+0.2%).
Randolph has the youngest population (median age 40.4).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Worcester | Windsor | Randolph |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 831Lowest |
3,554 |
4,843Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -3.4%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
+0.2%Highest VT: +2.8% |
-0.1% VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 47±2.7Highest 9% above VT |
44.8±6.5 4% above VT |
40.4±7.4Lowest 6% below VT |
| Worcester and Windsor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 12.8%±3.9Lowest VT: 17.9% |
19.5%±5.2Highest VT: 17.9% |
17.3%±4.4 VT: 17.9% |
| Windsor and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 19.5%±2.5Lowest VT: 21.4% |
29.7%±6.9Highest VT: 21.4% |
22.9%±4.2 VT: 21.4% |
| Windsor and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 53%Highest VT: 43.8% |
39.7%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
40.8% VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 6.9%±4.7 VT: 7% |
0.7%±0.8Lowest VT: 7% |
11.2%±2.5Highest VT: 7% |
| Randolph and Worcester are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $73,833±$18k 9% below VT |
$52,484±$11kLowest 35% below VT |
$76,758±$6kHighest 5% below VT |
| Randolph and Worcester are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $271,100±$27k 14% below VT |
$207,500±$31kLowest 34% below VT |
$278,700±$38kHighest 12% below VT |
| Randolph and Worcester are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,023±$136Lowest 17% below VT |
$1,026±$89 17% below VT |
$1,172±$173Highest 5% below VT |
| Randolph and Windsor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $4,421Lowest 12% below VT |
$5,209Highest 3% above VT |
$4,698 7% below VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 25.5%±37Lowest VT: 48.4% |
31.5%±17 VT: 48.4% |
54.1%±17.8Highest VT: 48.4% |
| Randolph and Windsor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 5.9%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
7.8%Highest VT: 10.1% |
7.7% VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 85.9%Highest VT: 73.2% |
57.8%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
67.2% VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1976Highest same as VT |
1945Lowest 31 yrs older than VT |
1971 5 yrs older than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 29 minHighest 22% above VT |
23 min 3% below VT |
21 minLowest 12% below VT |
| Work from home | 23.6%±4.8Highest VT: 16.9% |
10.3%±5Lowest VT: 16.9% |
12.9%±4.7 VT: 16.9% |
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | — | #61 of 70 in VT | #55 of 70 in VT |
| School district | Washington Central Unified Union School District #92 | — | Orange Southwest Unified Union School District #59 |
| High school in town | None in town | — | Randolph Union High School |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | — | 9.4 |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | 6 photos → | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.