Compare towns
Worcester vs Peacham vs Guilford
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Worcester has the most affordable homes ($271k median).
Peacham has the highest household income ($90k).
Guilford has grown the fastest since 2010 (0%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Worcester | Peacham | Guilford |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 831Lowest |
887 |
2,461Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -3.4%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
-2.3% VT: +2.8% |
0%Highest VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 47±2.7 9% above VT |
50.1±5.7Highest 16% above VT |
46.7±5.2Lowest 8% above VT |
| Peacham and Worcester are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 12.8%±3.9Lowest VT: 17.9% |
20.7%±6Highest VT: 17.9% |
17.5%±4.9 VT: 17.9% |
| Peacham and Guilford are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 19.5%±2.5Lowest VT: 21.4% |
33.6%±2.6Highest VT: 21.4% |
27.6%±4 VT: 21.4% |
| Peacham and Guilford are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 53%Highest VT: 43.8% |
48.9% VT: 43.8% |
44.8%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 6.9%±4.7Highest VT: 7% |
5.4%±4 VT: 7% |
2.6%±2.4Lowest VT: 7% |
| Worcester and Peacham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $73,833±$18kLowest 9% below VT |
$90,000±$28kHighest 11% above VT |
$75,243±$6k 7% below VT |
| Peacham and Guilford are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $271,100±$27kLowest 14% below VT |
$302,000±$64k 5% below VT |
$312,600±$39kHighest about the VT average |
| Guilford and Peacham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,023±$136Lowest 17% below VT |
$1,028±$248 17% below VT |
$1,283±$273Highest 4% above VT |
| Guilford and Peacham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $4,421Lowest 12% below VT |
$5,605 11% above VT |
$5,827Highest 16% above VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 25.5%±37Lowest VT: 48.4% |
66.7%±17.7Highest VT: 48.4% |
46.9%±19.4 VT: 48.4% |
| Peacham and Guilford are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 5.9%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
10.6%Highest VT: 10.1% |
10.6%Highest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 85.9%Highest VT: 73.2% |
76.1%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
80.1% VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1976Lowest same as VT |
1976Lowest same as VT |
1980Highest 4 yrs newer than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 29 min 22% above VT |
31 minHighest 31% above VT |
25 minLowest 7% above VT |
| Work from home | 23.6%±4.8 VT: 16.9% |
24.2%±16.9Highest VT: 16.9% |
16.7%±5.3Lowest VT: 16.9% |
| Peacham and Worcester are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| School district | Washington Central Unified Union School District #92 | Peacham School District | Windham Southeast Unified Union School District #96 |
| High school in town | None in town | None in town | None in town |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.