Compare towns
Worcester vs Manchester
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Worcester has the most affordable homes ($271k median).
Manchester has grown the fastest since 2010 (+2.1%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Worcester | Manchester |
|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | ||
| People | ||
| Population | 831Lowest |
4,486Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -3.4%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
+2.1%Highest VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 47±2.7Lowest 9% above VT |
54.5±6.3Highest 26% above VT |
| Manchester and Worcester are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Kids under 18 | 12.8%±3.9Lowest VT: 17.9% |
16.9%±4.5Highest VT: 17.9% |
| Manchester and Worcester are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Age 65+ | 19.5%±2.5Lowest VT: 21.4% |
25.7%±4.6Highest VT: 21.4% |
| Manchester and Worcester are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 53%Highest VT: 43.8% |
47.4%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 6.9%±4.7Highest VT: 7% |
5.8%±3Lowest VT: 7% |
| Worcester and Manchester are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Cost of living | ||
| Household incomemedian | $73,833±$18kLowest 9% below VT |
$94,886±$23kHighest 17% above VT |
| Manchester and Worcester are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $271,100±$27kLowest 14% below VT |
$454,600±$47kHighest 44% above VT |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,023±$136Lowest 17% below VT |
$1,057±$76Highest 14% below VT |
| Manchester and Worcester are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $4,421Lowest 12% below VT |
$5,923Highest 18% above VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 25.5%±37Lowest VT: 48.4% |
56.5%±13.9Highest VT: 48.4% |
| Manchester and Worcester are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Below poverty line | 5.9%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
16.8%Highest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | ||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 85.9%Highest VT: 73.2% |
73.8%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1976Lowest same as VT |
1981Highest 5 yrs newer than VT |
| Getting to work | ||
| Average commuteone way | 29 minHighest 22% above VT |
14 minLowest 39% below VT |
| Work from home | 23.6%±4.8Highest VT: 16.9% |
23.1%±5.2Lowest VT: 16.9% |
| Worcester and Manchester are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Schools | ||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | — | #37 of 70 in VT |
| School district | Washington Central Unified Union School District #92 | Taconic and Green Regional School District #63 |
| High school in town | None in town | None in town |
| On TownTapestry | ||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.

