Compare towns
Wolfeboro vs Woolwich vs Brunswick
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Wolfeboro has the most expensive homes ($547k median).
Woolwich has the most affordable homes ($255k median).
Brunswick has grown the fastest since 2010 (+12.2%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Wolfeboro | Woolwich | Brunswick |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 6,571 |
3,158Lowest |
17,652Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +2.3% U.S.: +7.4% |
-0.1%Lowest U.S.: +7.4% |
+12.2%Highest U.S.: +7.4% |
| Median age | 57±1.8Highest 47% above U.S. |
55.8±5.5 43% above U.S. |
37.9±2.2Lowest about the U.S. average |
| Wolfeboro and Woolwich are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 13.7%±3.3Lowest U.S.: 22% |
15%±5.5 U.S.: 22% |
16.1%±2.5Highest U.S.: 22% |
| Brunswick and Woolwich are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 34.6%±5.2Highest U.S.: 17.2% |
33.9%±8.2 U.S.: 17.2% |
23%±2.4Lowest U.S.: 17.2% |
| Wolfeboro and Woolwich are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 45%Lowest U.S.: 35.7% |
52.9%Highest U.S.: 35.7% |
51.3% U.S.: 35.7% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 2.8%±1.8 U.S.: 6.4% |
2.4%±2.1Lowest U.S.: 6.4% |
15.4%±1.2Highest U.S.: 6.4% |
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $94,375±$22k 17% above U.S. |
$102,175±$26kHighest 27% above U.S. |
$70,722±$5kLowest 12% below U.S. |
| Woolwich and Wolfeboro are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $546,500±$60kHighest 64% above U.S. |
$254,500±$59kLowest 24% below U.S. |
$363,200±$18k 9% above U.S. |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,103±$76Lowest 22% below U.S. |
— | $1,465±$100Highest 4% above U.S. |
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $4,531Highest 45% above U.S. |
$2,433Lowest 22% below U.S. |
$4,477 44% above U.S. |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 12%±11.6Lowest U.S.: 51.1% |
64.3%±100Highest U.S.: 51.1% |
58.8%±9.2 U.S.: 51.1% |
| Woolwich and Brunswick are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 8.2%Lowest U.S.: 12.5% |
13.3%Highest U.S.: 12.5% |
8.6% U.S.: 12.5% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 78.1% U.S.: 65.2% |
95.5%Highest U.S.: 65.2% |
66.3%Lowest U.S.: 65.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1982Highest 2 yrs newer than U.S. |
1982Highest 2 yrs newer than U.S. |
1977Lowest 3 yrs older than U.S. |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 24 min 10% below U.S. |
29 minHighest 11% above U.S. |
23 minLowest 14% below U.S. |
| Work from home | 22.9%±6.6Highest U.S.: 15.1% |
11.9%±6.2Lowest U.S.: 15.1% |
18%±4.2 U.S.: 15.1% |
| Wolfeboro and Brunswick are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #46 of 120 in NH | #92 of 133 in ME | #30 of 133 in ME |
| School district | Governor Wentworth Regional School District | RSU 01 - LKRSU | — |
| High school in town | Kingswood Regional High School | None in town | — |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 11.1 |
— | — |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | None yet |
U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.