Compare towns
Winhall vs Enosburgh vs Sunderland
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Winhall has the most people working from home (18.4%).
Enosburgh has the most affordable homes ($223k median).
Sunderland has the shortest commute (23 min average).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Winhall | Enosburgh | Sunderland |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 752Lowest |
2,804Highest |
1,269 |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +53.7%Highest VT: +2.8% |
— | +10.5%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 48.9±6.1Highest 13% above VT |
40.6±3.9Lowest 6% below VT |
40.8±2.8 5% below VT |
| Winhall and Sunderland are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 17%±6.8Lowest VT: 17.9% |
21%±4.2 VT: 17.9% |
23.6%±5.4Highest VT: 17.9% |
| Sunderland and Enosburgh are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 20.6%±5.3Highest VT: 21.4% |
17.9%±3.3 VT: 21.4% |
16.7%±2.7Lowest VT: 21.4% |
| Winhall and Enosburgh are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 67.4%Highest VT: 43.8% |
20.1%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
41.4% VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 3.1%±4Lowest VT: 7% |
5.4%±2.4Highest VT: 7% |
3.1%±3.9Lowest VT: 7% |
| Enosburgh and Winhall are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $95,500±$23kHighest 18% above VT |
$63,828±$17kLowest 21% below VT |
$88,523±$16k 9% above VT |
| Winhall and Sunderland are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $471,800±$55kHighest 49% above VT |
$223,100±$39kLowest 30% below VT |
$300,000±$43k 5% below VT |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,094±$732 11% below VT |
$852±$87Lowest 31% below VT |
$1,413±$242Highest 15% above VT |
| Sunderland and Winhall are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $6,567Highest 30% above VT |
$3,624Lowest 28% below VT |
$4,136 18% below VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 37.5%±38.9Lowest VT: 48.4% |
48.9%±11.2 VT: 48.4% |
51.5%±61.5Highest VT: 48.4% |
| Sunderland and Enosburgh are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 5.3%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
13.9%Highest VT: 10.1% |
11.2% VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 80.5% VT: 73.2% |
75.7%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
91.9%Highest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1982Highest 6 yrs newer than VT |
1972Lowest 4 yrs older than VT |
1973 3 yrs older than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 27 min 13% above VT |
32 minHighest 36% above VT |
23 minLowest 4% below VT |
| Work from home | 18.4%±9Highest VT: 16.9% |
10.1%±4.4Lowest VT: 16.9% |
11.6%±5 VT: 16.9% |
| Winhall and Sunderland are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | — | #26 of 70 in VT | — |
| School district | — | Enosburgh-Richford Unified Union School District #88 | Taconic and Green Regional School District #63 |
| High school in town | — | Enosburg Falls Middle/High School | None in town |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | 10.4 |
— |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.