Compare towns
Windsor vs Norwich vs Cavendish
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Windsor has the most affordable homes ($208k median).
Norwich has grown the fastest since 2010 (+5.8%).
Cavendish has the most homeowners (81.3%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Windsor | Norwich | Cavendish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 3,554 |
3,640Highest |
1,242Lowest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +0.2%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
+5.8%Highest VT: +2.8% |
+1.8% VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 44.8±6.5 4% above VT |
40.8±3.2Lowest 5% below VT |
45.2±5.9Highest 5% above VT |
| Cavendish and Windsor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 19.5%±5.2 VT: 17.9% |
24%±5.1Highest VT: 17.9% |
18.3%±4.8Lowest VT: 17.9% |
| Norwich and Windsor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 29.7%±6.9Highest VT: 21.4% |
16%±3.4Lowest VT: 21.4% |
23.6%±2 VT: 21.4% |
| Windsor and Cavendish are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 39.7% VT: 43.8% |
81%Highest VT: 43.8% |
39.3%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 0.7%±0.8Lowest VT: 7% |
4.8%±2.4Highest VT: 7% |
4.3%±1.9 VT: 7% |
| Norwich and Cavendish are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $52,484±$11kLowest 35% below VT |
$140,313±$12kHighest 73% above VT |
$89,063±$29k 10% above VT |
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $207,500±$31kLowest 34% below VT |
$637,500±$76kHighest 101% above VT |
$285,100±$40k 10% below VT |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,026±$89 17% below VT |
$1,460±$322Highest 18% above VT |
$1,000±$546Lowest 19% below VT |
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $5,209 3% above VT |
$10,000+Highest at least 98% above VT |
$3,948Lowest 22% below VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 31.5%±17Highest VT: 48.4% |
30.7%±19.9 VT: 48.4% |
28.9%±27Lowest VT: 48.4% |
| Windsor and Norwich are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 7.8%Highest VT: 10.1% |
2.8%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
6.3% VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 57.8%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
71.9% VT: 73.2% |
81.3%Highest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1945Lowest 31 yrs older than VT |
1982Highest 6 yrs newer than VT |
1968 8 yrs older than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 23 minHighest 3% below VT |
19 min 19% below VT |
19 minLowest 21% below VT |
| Work from home | 10.3%±5Lowest VT: 16.9% |
21%±5.3Highest VT: 16.9% |
18.5%±6.6 VT: 16.9% |
| Norwich and Cavendish are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #61 of 70 in VT | #1 of 70 in VT | — |
| School district | — | Norwich School District | Green Mountain Unified School District #77 |
| High school in town | — | None in town | None in town |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.