Compare towns
Windsor vs Johnson vs Jericho vs Windsor
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Johnson has the youngest population (median age 30.9).
Jericho has the most expensive homes ($493k median).
Windsor has grown the fastest since 2010 (+3.5%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Windsor | Johnson | Jericho | Windsor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | ||||
| People | ||||
| Population | 3,554 |
3,450 |
5,114Highest |
2,060Lowest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +0.2%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
+1.3% VT: +2.8% |
+1.9% VT: +2.8% |
+3.5%Highest VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 44.8±6.5 4% above VT |
30.9±6.5Lowest 28% below VT |
49.7±5.1Highest 15% above VT |
44.6±12.3 3% above VT |
| Jericho and Windsor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||||
| Kids under 18 | 19.5%±5.2Lowest VT: 17.9% |
22.7%±5Highest VT: 17.9% |
19.5%±4.2Lowest VT: 17.9% |
21.1%±8.8 VT: 17.9% |
| Johnson and Windsor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||||
| Age 65+ | 29.7%±6.9Highest VT: 21.4% |
10.8%±3.1Lowest VT: 21.4% |
20.2%±4.4 VT: 21.4% |
29.2%±8 VT: 21.4% |
| Windsor and Windsor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 39.7% VT: 43.8% |
32.2%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
65.3%Highest VT: 43.8% |
40% VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 0.7%±0.8Lowest VT: 7% |
14.4%±2.1Highest VT: 7% |
2.4%±1.6 VT: 7% |
1.2%±1.4 VT: 7% |
| Cost of living | ||||
| Household incomemedian | $52,484±$11k 35% below VT |
$55,346±$14k 32% below VT |
$116,923±$16kHighest 44% above VT |
$51,197±$4kLowest 37% below VT |
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $207,500±$31k 34% below VT |
$169,400±$62kLowest 46% below VT |
$493,100±$38kHighest 56% above VT |
$170,300±$22k 46% below VT |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,026±$89 17% below VT |
$948±$45Lowest 23% below VT |
$1,731±$111Highest 40% above VT |
$1,002±$107 19% below VT |
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $5,209 3% above VT |
$3,310Lowest 34% below VT |
$7,318Highest 45% above VT |
$4,878 3% below VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 31.5%±17 VT: 48.4% |
51.6%±20.8 VT: 48.4% |
79.3%±52.9Highest VT: 48.4% |
31.4%±20Lowest VT: 48.4% |
| Jericho and Johnson are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||||
| Below poverty line | 7.8% VT: 10.1% |
12.2%Highest VT: 10.1% |
0.9%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
7.8% VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | ||||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 57.8% VT: 73.2% |
58.4% VT: 73.2% |
92.9%Highest VT: 73.2% |
51.6%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1945 31 yrs older than VT |
1980 4 yrs newer than VT |
1983Highest 7 yrs newer than VT |
1938Lowest 38 yrs older than VT |
| Getting to work | ||||
| Average commuteone way | 23 min 3% below VT |
33 minHighest 42% above VT |
26 min 10% above VT |
22 minLowest 6% below VT |
| Work from home | 10.3%±5 VT: 16.9% |
8.8%±4.6 VT: 16.9% |
21.8%±6.4Highest VT: 16.9% |
6.6%±4.7Lowest VT: 16.9% |
| Schools | ||||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #61 of 70 in VT | #57 of 70 in VT | #6 of 70 in VT | #61 of 70 in VT |
| School district | — | Lamoille North Modified Union School District #058A | Mount Mansfield Unified Union School District #401 | — |
| High school in town | — | None in town | Mt. Mansfield Union High School | — |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | — | 13.0 |
— |
| On TownTapestry | ||||
| Old photos in History | 12 photos → | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.