Compare towns
Windsor vs Lancaster
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Windsor has the most affordable homes ($170k median).
Lancaster has the most people working from home (33.6%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Windsor | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | ||
| People | ||
| Population | 2,060Lowest |
8,606Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +3.5%Lowest U.S.: +7.4% |
+4.8%Highest U.S.: +7.4% |
| Median age | 44.6±12.3Highest 15% above U.S. |
43.1±4.9Lowest 11% above U.S. |
| Windsor and Lancaster are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Kids under 18 | 21.1%±8.8Highest U.S.: 22% |
19.2%±4Lowest U.S.: 22% |
| Windsor and Lancaster are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Age 65+ | 29.2%±8Highest U.S.: 17.2% |
19.9%±4.2Lowest U.S.: 17.2% |
| Windsor and Lancaster are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 40%Lowest U.S.: 35.7% |
50.3%Highest U.S.: 35.7% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 1.2%±1.4Lowest U.S.: 6.4% |
3%±1.8Highest U.S.: 6.4% |
| Lancaster and Windsor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Cost of living | ||
| Household incomemedian | $51,197±$4kLowest 37% below U.S. |
$134,833±$27kHighest 67% above U.S. |
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $170,300±$22kLowest 49% below U.S. |
$519,100±$60kHighest 56% above U.S. |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,002±$107Lowest 29% below U.S. |
$2,338±$539Highest 65% above U.S. |
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $4,878Lowest 56% above U.S. |
$7,235Highest 132% above U.S. |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 31.4%±20Lowest U.S.: 51.1% |
68.3%±36.7Highest U.S.: 51.1% |
| Lancaster and Windsor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Below poverty line | 7.8%Highest U.S.: 12.5% |
1.4%Lowest U.S.: 12.5% |
| Housing | ||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 51.6%Lowest U.S.: 65.2% |
85.1%Highest U.S.: 65.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1938Lowest 42 yrs older than U.S. |
1971Highest 9 yrs older than U.S. |
| Getting to work | ||
| Average commuteone way | 22 minLowest 16% below U.S. |
32 minHighest 20% above U.S. |
| Work from home | 6.6%±4.7Lowest U.S.: 15.1% |
33.6%±9.1Highest U.S.: 15.1% |
| Schools | ||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #61 of 70 in VT | #145 of 282 in MA |
| School district | — | Nashoba |
| High school in town | — | None in town |
| On TownTapestry | ||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet |
U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.
