Compare towns
Windham vs Warren vs Cavendish
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Windham has the highest household income ($95k).
Warren has the most people working from home (36.2%).
Cavendish has the most affordable homes ($285k median).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Windham | Warren | Cavendish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 594Lowest |
1,585Highest |
1,242 |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | — | +16%Highest VT: +2.8% |
+1.8%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 44.2±7.4Lowest about the VT average |
53.1±4.2Highest 23% above VT |
45.2±5.9 5% above VT |
| Warren and Cavendish are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 17.5%±7.9 VT: 17.9% |
9.3%±3.1Lowest VT: 17.9% |
18.3%±4.8Highest VT: 17.9% |
| Cavendish and Windham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 23.2%±8.1Lowest VT: 21.4% |
30.1%±4.9Highest VT: 21.4% |
23.6%±2 VT: 21.4% |
| Warren and Cavendish are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 48.1% VT: 43.8% |
60%Highest VT: 43.8% |
39.3%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 0.8%±1.1Lowest VT: 7% |
3.6%±4 VT: 7% |
4.3%±1.9Highest VT: 7% |
| Cavendish and Warren are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $94,500±$12kHighest 16% above VT |
$86,905±$16kLowest 7% above VT |
$89,063±$29k 10% above VT |
| Windham and Cavendish are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $353,900±$20k 12% above VT |
$569,300±$123kHighest 80% above VT |
$285,100±$40kLowest 10% below VT |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | — | $1,750±$394Highest 42% above VT |
$1,000±$546Lowest 19% below VT |
| Warren and Cavendish are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $5,951 18% above VT |
$7,284Highest 45% above VT |
$3,948Lowest 22% below VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 41.2%±94Highest VT: 48.4% |
32.3%±26.6 VT: 48.4% |
28.9%±27Lowest VT: 48.4% |
| Windham and Warren are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 9.9% VT: 10.1% |
15.7%Highest VT: 10.1% |
6.3%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 82.9% VT: 73.2% |
86.7%Highest VT: 73.2% |
81.3%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1982Highest 6 yrs newer than VT |
1977 1 yr newer than VT |
1968Lowest 8 yrs older than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 27 minHighest 14% above VT |
19 minLowest 21% below VT |
19 minLowest 21% below VT |
| Work from home | 20.5%±5.6 VT: 16.9% |
36.2%±5Highest VT: 16.9% |
18.5%±6.6Lowest VT: 16.9% |
| Schools | |||
| School district | — | Harwood Unified Union School District #60 | Green Mountain Unified School District #77 |
| High school in town | — | None in town | None in town |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | 18 photos → |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.