Compare towns
Windham vs Proctor vs Randolph
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Windham has the most people working from home (20.5%).
Proctor has the most affordable homes ($210k median).
Randolph has the most renters (32.8% rent).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Windham | Proctor | Randolph |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 594Lowest |
1,794 |
4,843Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | — | +1.3%Highest VT: +2.8% |
-0.1%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 44.2±7.4Highest about the VT average |
42.4±6.4 about the VT average |
40.4±7.4Lowest 6% below VT |
| Windham and Proctor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 17.5%±7.9 VT: 17.9% |
21.8%±4.4Highest VT: 17.9% |
17.3%±4.4Lowest VT: 17.9% |
| Proctor and Windham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 23.2%±8.1Highest VT: 21.4% |
22.4%±2.5Lowest VT: 21.4% |
22.9%±4.2 VT: 21.4% |
| Windham and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 48.1%Highest VT: 43.8% |
28.1%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
40.8% VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 0.8%±1.1Lowest VT: 7% |
3.6%±1.7 VT: 7% |
11.2%±2.5Highest VT: 7% |
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $94,500±$12kHighest 16% above VT |
$74,167±$12kLowest 9% below VT |
$76,758±$6k 5% below VT |
| Windham and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $353,900±$20kHighest 12% above VT |
$209,900±$17kLowest 34% below VT |
$278,700±$38k 12% below VT |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | — | $1,029±$202Lowest 17% below VT |
$1,172±$173Highest 5% below VT |
| Randolph and Proctor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $5,951Highest 18% above VT |
$4,032Lowest 20% below VT |
$4,698 7% below VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 41.2%±94 VT: 48.4% |
37.3%±16.2Lowest VT: 48.4% |
54.1%±17.8Highest VT: 48.4% |
| Randolph and Windham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 9.9% VT: 10.1% |
16.2%Highest VT: 10.1% |
7.7%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 82.9% VT: 73.2% |
86.7%Highest VT: 73.2% |
67.2%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1982Highest 6 yrs newer than VT |
1938Lowest 38 yrs older than VT |
1971 5 yrs older than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 27 minHighest 14% above VT |
22 min 6% below VT |
21 minLowest 12% below VT |
| Work from home | 20.5%±5.6Highest VT: 16.9% |
9.4%±4.6Lowest VT: 16.9% |
12.9%±4.7 VT: 16.9% |
| Windham and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | — | — | #55 of 70 in VT |
| School district | — | Quarry Valley Unified Union School District #70 | Orange Southwest Unified Union School District #59 |
| High school in town | — | Proctor Junior/Senior High School | Randolph Union High School |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | 8.7Lowest |
9.4Highest |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.