Compare towns
Windham vs Newfane vs Rensselaerville
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Windham has grown the fastest since 2010 (+0.3%).
Newfane has the most people working from home (30.8%).
Rensselaerville has the most kids (14% under 18).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Windham | Newfane | Rensselaerville |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 1,432Lowest |
1,456 |
1,901Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +0.3%Highest U.S.: +7.4% |
-4.7%Lowest U.S.: +7.4% |
-0.9% U.S.: +7.4% |
| Median age | 56.5±5.1Highest 45% above U.S. |
54.4±3.9 40% above U.S. |
54±3.3Lowest 39% above U.S. |
| Windham and Newfane are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 11.1%±4.4Lowest U.S.: 22% |
11.1%±3.7Lowest U.S.: 22% |
14%±2.9Highest U.S.: 22% |
| Rensselaerville and Windham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 31.4%±5.2Highest U.S.: 17.2% |
29.2%±3.9Lowest U.S.: 17.2% |
30.1%±6.6 U.S.: 17.2% |
| Windham and Rensselaerville are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 43.8% U.S.: 35.7% |
46.5%Highest U.S.: 35.7% |
40.1%Lowest U.S.: 35.7% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 6.6%±5Highest U.S.: 6.4% |
2.4%±2.1 U.S.: 6.4% |
1.3%±1.6Lowest U.S.: 6.4% |
| Windham and Newfane are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $76,477±$17k 5% below U.S. |
$66,719±$21kLowest 17% below U.S. |
$90,324±$26kHighest 12% above U.S. |
| Rensselaerville and Windham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $315,600±$74kHighest 5% below U.S. |
$284,200±$49k 15% below U.S. |
$259,800±$36kLowest 22% below U.S. |
| Windham and Newfane are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $850±$295Lowest 40% below U.S. |
$1,266±$238Highest 10% below U.S. |
$1,264±$152 11% below U.S. |
| Newfane and Rensselaerville are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $3,363Lowest 8% above U.S. |
$5,174 66% above U.S. |
$5,247Highest 68% above U.S. |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 68.9%±35.7Highest U.S.: 51.1% |
51.9%±79.7 U.S.: 51.1% |
14.7%±61.5Lowest U.S.: 51.1% |
| Windham and Newfane are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 7.4% U.S.: 12.5% |
10.9%Highest U.S.: 12.5% |
0.8%Lowest U.S.: 12.5% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 89% U.S.: 65.2% |
87.2%Lowest U.S.: 65.2% |
89.9%Highest U.S.: 65.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1985Highest 5 yrs newer than U.S. |
1971Lowest 9 yrs older than U.S. |
1972 8 yrs older than U.S. |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 27 min about the U.S. average |
27 minLowest about the U.S. average |
38 minHighest 43% above U.S. |
| Work from home | 17.1%±6.9 U.S.: 15.1% |
30.8%±12.5Highest U.S.: 15.1% |
13.8%±6.3Lowest U.S.: 15.1% |
| Newfane and Windham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| School district | — | West River Valley Union Education District #72A | — |
| High school in town | — | None in town | — |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.