Compare towns
Willimantic vs Prospect vs Norwich
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Connecticut.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Willimantic has the most renters (65.1% rent).
Prospect has the highest household income ($126k).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Willimantic | Prospect | Norwich |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 18,096 |
9,458Lowest |
39,973Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +2.3%Highest CT: +0.9% |
— | -0.9%Lowest CT: +0.9% |
| Median age | 31.3±2.7Lowest 24% below CT |
46.8±3.9Highest 14% above CT |
38.5±1.7 6% below CT |
| Kids under 18 | 20.6%±2.5Lowest CT: 20.2% |
21.4%±4.1Highest CT: 20.2% |
20.9%±1.8 CT: 20.2% |
| Prospect and Norwich are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 11%±1.7Lowest CT: 18.5% |
24.5%±4.3Highest CT: 18.5% |
16.9%±1.7 CT: 18.5% |
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 24.2% CT: 42.5% |
40.3%Highest CT: 42.5% |
23.1%Lowest CT: 42.5% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 19.1%±2.1Highest CT: 7.1% |
3.5%±1.8Lowest CT: 7.1% |
5.6%±1.2 CT: 7.1% |
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $45,962±$7kLowest 52% below CT |
$126,394±$18kHighest 32% above CT |
$65,024±$5k 32% below CT |
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $190,900±$17kLowest 48% below CT |
$355,400±$21kHighest 3% below CT |
$242,300±$11k 34% below CT |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,063±$68Lowest 29% below CT |
$1,800±$433Highest 21% above CT |
$1,253±$68 16% below CT |
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $4,678Lowest 30% below CT |
$6,504Highest about the CT average |
$4,703 29% below CT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 55.9%±8.1 CT: 52.6% |
45.3%±31.8Lowest CT: 52.6% |
56.2%±7.2Highest CT: 52.6% |
| Norwich and Willimantic are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 23.4%Highest CT: 10% |
3.2%Lowest CT: 10% |
16.7% CT: 10% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 34.9%Lowest CT: 66.5% |
93.5%Highest CT: 66.5% |
53.8% CT: 66.5% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1953Lowest 14 yrs older than CT |
1974Highest 7 yrs newer than CT |
1957 10 yrs older than CT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 23 minLowest 12% below CT |
28 minHighest 4% above CT |
24 min 9% below CT |
| Work from home | 6.2%±2Lowest CT: 16% |
10.1%±3.2Highest CT: 16% |
7.2%±2 CT: 16% |
| Prospect and Norwich are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | — | #50 of 149 in CT | #133 of 149 in CT |
| School district | — | Regional School District 16 | Connecticut Technical Education and Career System · Norwich School District |
| High school in town | — | None in town | Norwich Free Academy |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | — | 14.8 |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
CT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.