Compare towns
Wilder vs Woodstock vs Richmond
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Wilder has grown the fastest since 2010 (+81.7%).
Woodstock has the most people working from home (32.8%).
Richmond has the most kids (21.5% under 18).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Wilder | Woodstock | Richmond |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 3,087 |
3,027Lowest |
4,159Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +81.7%Highest VT: +2.8% |
-1.4%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
+2.1% VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 45.5±8.9 6% above VT |
56±3.6Highest 30% above VT |
43.7±5.6Lowest about the VT average |
| Woodstock and Wilder are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 11.8%±4.1Lowest VT: 17.9% |
15.6%±4.6 VT: 17.9% |
21.5%±5Highest VT: 17.9% |
| Richmond and Woodstock are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 27.3%±4.4 VT: 21.4% |
32.7%±5.6Highest VT: 21.4% |
19.5%±6.3Lowest VT: 21.4% |
| Woodstock and Wilder are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 60.2%Highest VT: 43.8% |
52.9%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
59.1% VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 8.1%±3.9Highest VT: 7% |
0.6%±0.6Lowest VT: 7% |
2.8%±1.7 VT: 7% |
| Wilder and Richmond are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $75,143±$9kLowest 7% below VT |
$120,938±$29kHighest 49% above VT |
$108,235±$24k 33% above VT |
| Woodstock and Richmond are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $273,200±$18kLowest 14% below VT |
$582,000±$84kHighest 84% above VT |
$432,200±$39k 37% above VT |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,142±$451Lowest 7% below VT |
$1,430±$346Highest 16% above VT |
— |
| Woodstock and Wilder are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $5,505Lowest 9% above VT |
$9,449Highest 88% above VT |
$6,868 36% above VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 39.9%±17.2 VT: 48.4% |
44.7%±17.3Highest VT: 48.4% |
28.5%±15.8Lowest VT: 48.4% |
| Woodstock and Wilder are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 9.3%Highest VT: 10.1% |
8.9% VT: 10.1% |
4.2%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 62.9%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
69.4% VT: 73.2% |
78.8%Highest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1983Highest 7 yrs newer than VT |
1958Lowest 18 yrs older than VT |
1983Highest 7 yrs newer than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 17 minLowest 29% below VT |
22 min 7% below VT |
25 minHighest 6% above VT |
| Work from home | 12.6%±6.7Lowest VT: 16.9% |
32.8%±12.9Highest VT: 16.9% |
22.5%±6.1 VT: 16.9% |
| Woodstock and Richmond are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | — | #10 of 70 in VT | #5 of 70 in VT |
| School district | — | Mountain Views Unified Union School District #76 | Mount Mansfield Unified Union School District #401 |
| High school in town | — | Woodstock Union Middle/High School | None in town |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | 11.5 |
— |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.


