Compare towns
Wilder vs Hooksett vs Nottingham
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Wilder has grown the fastest since 2010 (+81.7%).
Nottingham has the most people working from home (22.2%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Wilder | Hooksett | Nottingham |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 3,087Lowest |
15,057Highest |
5,357 |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +81.7%Highest U.S.: +7.4% |
+10.6% U.S.: +7.4% |
+9.3%Lowest U.S.: +7.4% |
| Median age | 45.5±8.9Highest 17% above U.S. |
41.3±1.5 6% above U.S. |
38.8±6.7Lowest about the U.S. average |
| Wilder and Hooksett are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 11.8%±4.1Lowest U.S.: 22% |
17.4%±2.9 U.S.: 22% |
23.9%±5.4Highest U.S.: 22% |
| Nottingham and Hooksett are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 27.3%±4.4Highest U.S.: 17.2% |
17.3%±2.4Lowest U.S.: 17.2% |
18.4%±4.2 U.S.: 17.2% |
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 60.2%Highest U.S.: 35.7% |
39.6%Lowest U.S.: 35.7% |
40.9% U.S.: 35.7% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 8.1%±3.9 U.S.: 6.4% |
8.9%±1.6Highest U.S.: 6.4% |
5.9%±2.6Lowest U.S.: 6.4% |
| Hooksett and Wilder are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $75,143±$9kLowest 7% below U.S. |
$117,962±$11k 46% above U.S. |
$122,201±$20kHighest 51% above U.S. |
| Nottingham and Hooksett are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $273,200±$18kLowest 18% below U.S. |
$407,000±$26k 22% above U.S. |
$457,500±$26kHighest 38% above U.S. |
| Nottingham and Hooksett are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,142±$451Lowest 19% below U.S. |
$1,661±$206 18% above U.S. |
$2,068±$1kHighest 46% above U.S. |
| Nottingham and Hooksett are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $5,505Lowest 76% above U.S. |
$6,554 110% above U.S. |
$7,319Highest 135% above U.S. |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 39.9%±17.2Lowest U.S.: 51.1% |
41.7%±16.4 U.S.: 51.1% |
92.1%±44.9Highest U.S.: 51.1% |
| Nottingham and Hooksett are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 9.3%Highest U.S.: 12.5% |
3.3% U.S.: 12.5% |
1.4%Lowest U.S.: 12.5% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 62.9%Lowest U.S.: 65.2% |
80.6% U.S.: 65.2% |
94.3%Highest U.S.: 65.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1983Lowest 3 yrs newer than U.S. |
1988 8 yrs newer than U.S. |
1992Highest 12 yrs newer than U.S. |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 17 minLowest 37% below U.S. |
27 min about the U.S. average |
34 minHighest 28% above U.S. |
| Work from home | 12.6%±6.7Lowest U.S.: 15.1% |
13.4%±3.1 U.S.: 15.1% |
22.2%±5.8Highest U.S.: 15.1% |
| Nottingham and Hooksett are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | — | #30 of 120 in NH | #15 of 120 in NH |
| School district | — | Hooksett School District | Nottingham School District |
| High school in town | — | None in town | None in town |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | None yet |
U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.