Compare towns
Whitingham vs South Hooksett vs Readsboro
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Whitingham has the most people working from home (9.7%).
South Hooksett has grown the fastest since 2010 (+8.7%).
Readsboro has the most affordable homes ($216k median).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Whitingham | South Hooksett | Readsboro |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 1,368 |
5,902Highest |
807Lowest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -1% U.S.: +7.4% |
+8.7%Highest U.S.: +7.4% |
-8%Lowest U.S.: +7.4% |
| Median age | 46.4±7.1 19% above U.S. |
35.2±3.6Lowest 10% below U.S. |
50.7±3.9Highest 30% above U.S. |
| Readsboro and Whitingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 19.8%±4.5Highest U.S.: 22% |
16.3%±3.9 U.S.: 22% |
6.9%±2.6Lowest U.S.: 22% |
| Whitingham and South Hooksett are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 31.1%±2.3Highest U.S.: 17.2% |
13.5%±2.6Lowest U.S.: 17.2% |
20.6%±4.4 U.S.: 17.2% |
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 32.8% U.S.: 35.7% |
37.9%Highest U.S.: 35.7% |
26.7%Lowest U.S.: 35.7% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 2.2%±1.9Lowest U.S.: 6.4% |
14.3%±0.8Highest U.S.: 6.4% |
3.3%±1.8 U.S.: 6.4% |
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $70,625±$11k 13% below U.S. |
$130,000±$15kHighest 61% above U.S. |
$55,268±$12kLowest 32% below U.S. |
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $262,300±$30k 21% below U.S. |
$433,200±$40kHighest 30% above U.S. |
$215,500±$52kLowest 35% below U.S. |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $673±$150Lowest 52% below U.S. |
$1,471±$217Highest 4% above U.S. |
$724±$32 49% below U.S. |
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $5,055 62% above U.S. |
$6,801Highest 118% above U.S. |
$3,480Lowest 12% above U.S. |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 62.7%±47.3Highest U.S.: 51.1% |
36.1%±25 U.S.: 51.1% |
17.4%±24.3Lowest U.S.: 51.1% |
| Whitingham and South Hooksett are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 15.5%Highest U.S.: 12.5% |
4%Lowest U.S.: 12.5% |
7.3% U.S.: 12.5% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 85.2%Highest U.S.: 65.2% |
82.9% U.S.: 65.2% |
76.4%Lowest U.S.: 65.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1974 6 yrs older than U.S. |
1985Highest 5 yrs newer than U.S. |
1972Lowest 8 yrs older than U.S. |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 38 minHighest 44% above U.S. |
26 minLowest about the U.S. average |
32 min 20% above U.S. |
| Work from home | 9.7%±5.2Highest U.S.: 15.1% |
7.1%±2.4Lowest U.S.: 15.1% |
7.8%±3.1 U.S.: 15.1% |
| Whitingham and Readsboro are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| School district | Twin Valley Unified School District #75 | — | Readsboro School District |
| High school in town | Twin Valley Middle High School | — | None in town |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 7.8 |
— | — |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.