Compare towns
Whitingham vs Proctor vs Castleton
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Whitingham has the most expensive homes ($262k median).
Proctor has grown the fastest since 2010 (+1.3%).
Castleton has the shortest commute (19 min average).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Whitingham | Proctor | Castleton |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 1,368Lowest |
1,794 |
4,453Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -1% VT: +2.8% |
+1.3%Highest VT: +2.8% |
-5.5%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 46.4±7.1Highest 8% above VT |
42.4±6.4 about the VT average |
38.3±4.3Lowest 11% below VT |
| Whitingham and Proctor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 19.8%±4.5 VT: 17.9% |
21.8%±4.4Highest VT: 17.9% |
18.8%±6.4Lowest VT: 17.9% |
| Proctor and Whitingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 31.1%±2.3Highest VT: 21.4% |
22.4%±2.5 VT: 21.4% |
20.7%±4.6Lowest VT: 21.4% |
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 32.8% VT: 43.8% |
28.1%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
37.9%Highest VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 2.2%±1.9Lowest VT: 7% |
3.6%±1.7 VT: 7% |
19.3%±1.8Highest VT: 7% |
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $70,625±$11kLowest 13% below VT |
$74,167±$12kHighest 9% below VT |
$73,854±$23k 9% below VT |
| Proctor and Castleton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $262,300±$30kHighest 17% below VT |
$209,900±$17kLowest 34% below VT |
$224,800±$71k 29% below VT |
| Whitingham and Castleton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $673±$150Lowest 45% below VT |
$1,029±$202 17% below VT |
$1,137±$195Highest 8% below VT |
| Castleton and Proctor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $5,055Highest about the VT average |
$4,032 20% below VT |
$3,167Lowest 37% below VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 62.7%±47.3 VT: 48.4% |
37.3%±16.2Lowest VT: 48.4% |
67.7%±21.9Highest VT: 48.4% |
| Castleton and Whitingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 15.5% VT: 10.1% |
16.2%Highest VT: 10.1% |
12.5%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 85.2% VT: 73.2% |
86.7%Highest VT: 73.2% |
79%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1974Highest 2 yrs older than VT |
1938Lowest 38 yrs older than VT |
1974Highest 2 yrs older than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 38 minHighest 62% above VT |
22 min 6% below VT |
19 minLowest 17% below VT |
| Work from home | 9.7%±5.2Highest VT: 16.9% |
9.4%±4.6 VT: 16.9% |
6.2%±3.9Lowest VT: 16.9% |
| Whitingham and Proctor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | — | — | #39 of 70 in VT |
| School district | Twin Valley Unified School District #75 | Quarry Valley Unified Union School District #70 | Slate Valley Unified Union School District #62 |
| High school in town | Twin Valley Middle High School | Proctor Junior/Senior High School | None in town |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 7.8Lowest |
8.7Highest |
— |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.