Compare towns
West Warwick vs Ware vs Cranston
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..
What stands out worked out from the figures below
West Warwick has grown the fastest since 2010 (+6.2%).
Ware has the most affordable homes ($290k median).
Cranston has the highest household income ($90k).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | West Warwick | Ware | Cranston |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 31,173 |
10,048Lowest |
83,250Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +6.2%Highest U.S.: +7.4% |
+2%Lowest U.S.: +7.4% |
+3.2% U.S.: +7.4% |
| Median age | 42.8±1.5 10% above U.S. |
43.1±4.7Highest 11% above U.S. |
39.6±0.9Lowest about the U.S. average |
| Ware and West Warwick are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 15.7%±2.3Lowest U.S.: 22% |
19.1%±3.5 U.S.: 22% |
19.6%±1.4Highest U.S.: 22% |
| Cranston and Ware are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 20%±2.1 U.S.: 17.2% |
20.6%±3.4Highest U.S.: 17.2% |
16.8%±1.1Lowest U.S.: 17.2% |
| Ware and West Warwick are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 26.4% U.S.: 35.7% |
24%Lowest U.S.: 35.7% |
36.4%Highest U.S.: 35.7% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 5.7%±1.3 U.S.: 6.4% |
4.4%±2.2Lowest U.S.: 6.4% |
6.3%±0.8Highest U.S.: 6.4% |
| Cranston and West Warwick are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $77,608±$7k 4% below U.S. |
$67,475±$15kLowest 16% below U.S. |
$90,206±$4kHighest 12% above U.S. |
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $330,800±$12k about the U.S. average |
$289,700±$28kLowest 13% below U.S. |
$378,300±$7kHighest 14% above U.S. |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,303±$74 8% below U.S. |
$1,043±$109Lowest 26% below U.S. |
$1,375±$59Highest about the U.S. average |
| Cranston and West Warwick are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $4,962 59% above U.S. |
$4,237Lowest 36% above U.S. |
$5,103Highest 64% above U.S. |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 43.5%±7.8Lowest U.S.: 51.1% |
64.3%±16.2Highest U.S.: 51.1% |
47.3%±6 U.S.: 51.1% |
| Ware and Cranston are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 9.6%Lowest U.S.: 12.5% |
11.8%Highest U.S.: 12.5% |
10.2% U.S.: 12.5% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 57%Lowest U.S.: 65.2% |
72.3%Highest U.S.: 65.2% |
67.6% U.S.: 65.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1968Highest 12 yrs older than U.S. |
1960 20 yrs older than U.S. |
1958Lowest 22 yrs older than U.S. |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 25 min 5% below U.S. |
28 minHighest 8% above U.S. |
24 minLowest 8% below U.S. |
| Work from home | 7.2%±2Lowest U.S.: 15.1% |
12.3%±3.8 U.S.: 15.1% |
13%±1.2Highest U.S.: 15.1% |
| Cranston and Ware are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #33 of 38 in RI | #267 of 282 in MA | #27 of 38 in RI |
| School district | West Warwick | Ware | Achievement First Rhode Island · Cranston |
| High school in town | West Warwick High School | Ware Junior/Senior High School | Cranston High School West |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 13.0 |
11.1Lowest |
15.4Highest |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.