Compare towns

Webster vs Epping vs Warner vs Boscawen

Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against New Hampshire.

What stands out worked out from the figures below

Webster has the most kids (22.6% under 18).
Epping has grown the fastest since 2010 (+11.1%).
Warner has the youngest population (median age 43.7).
Boscawen has the most affordable homes ($287k median).

What matters to you?

Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.

MeasureWebsterEppingWarnerBoscawen
People
Population
2,227Lowest
7,430Highest
2,959
4,044
Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census
+2.2%
NH: +4.6%
+11.1%Highest
NH: +4.6%
+3.7%
NH: +4.6%
+0.8%Lowest
NH: +4.6%
Median age
44.7±7.6
3% above NH
45.1±3.5
4% above NH
43.7±4Lowest
about the NH average
46±4.2Highest
6% above NH
Boscawen and Epping are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Kids under 18
22.6%±8Highest
NH: 18.2%
18.7%±4.8
NH: 18.2%
17.3%±3.3Lowest
NH: 18.2%
18.1%±4.5
NH: 18.2%
Webster and Epping are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Age 65+
19.4%±1.3Lowest
NH: 20.1%
22.6%±5.2
NH: 20.1%
20.4%±3.5
NH: 20.1%
25.2%±5.3Highest
NH: 20.1%
Boscawen and Epping are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+
30.7%
NH: 40.6%
37%
NH: 40.6%
42.4%Highest
NH: 40.6%
20.5%Lowest
NH: 40.6%
Enrolled in collegeshare of residents
3%±1.4
NH: 6%
5.1%±3.3
NH: 6%
5.3%±1.6Highest
NH: 6%
2.3%±1.9Lowest
NH: 6%
Warner and Epping are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Cost of living
Household incomemedian
$107,171±$14kHighest
8% above NH
$104,220±$7k
5% above NH
$94,022±$18k
5% below NH
$77,328±$27kLowest
22% below NH
Webster and Epping are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Home valuemedian, owner-occupied
$338,500±$30k
16% below NH
$436,900±$35kHighest
9% above NH
$353,100±$22k
12% below NH
$286,500±$23kLowest
29% below NH
Rentmedian gross, monthly
$1,396±$622
6% below NH
$1,742±$576Highest
17% above NH
$1,219±$123Lowest
18% below NH
$1,265±$307
15% below NH
Epping and Webster are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Property taxmedian, yearly
$6,021Lowest
10% below NH
$6,936
4% above NH
$7,650Highest
15% above NH
$6,549
about the NH average
Renters paying 30%+of income on rent
53.6%±71
NH: 48.2%
67.8%±25.9Highest
NH: 48.2%
48.7%±21.3
NH: 48.2%
41.2%±21Lowest
NH: 48.2%
Epping and Webster are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Below poverty line
9.6%
NH: 7.2%
4.7%Lowest
NH: 7.2%
8.4%
NH: 7.2%
17%Highest
NH: 7.2%
Housing
Homeownersof occupied homes
96%Highest
NH: 72.8%
86.3%
NH: 72.8%
74.6%Lowest
NH: 72.8%
75.3%
NH: 72.8%
Typical home builtmedian year
1979
same as NH
1989Highest
10 yrs newer than NH
1975Lowest
4 yrs older than NH
1978
1 yr older than NH
Getting to work
Average commuteone way
31 min
14% above NH
32 minHighest
21% above NH
32 min
19% above NH
28 minLowest
4% above NH
Work from home
17.1%±3.9
NH: 16.8%
24%±6.9Highest
NH: 16.8%
16.6%±4.8
NH: 16.8%
9.9%±6.1Lowest
NH: 16.8%
Epping and Webster are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Schools
Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading — #77 of 120 in NH — #51 of 120 in NH
School district Merrimack Valley School District Epping School District Kearsarge Regional School District Merrimack Valley School District
High school in town None in town Epping High School None in town None in town
Students per teacherat that high school —
9.3
— —
On TownTapestry
Old photos in History None yet None yet None yet None yet

NH average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.