Compare towns

Webster vs Easthampton vs Gardner vs Clinton

Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Massachusetts.

What stands out worked out from the figures below

Webster has the most kids (21.8% under 18).
Easthampton has the most people working from home (19%).
Gardner has the most affordable homes ($302k median).
Clinton has the highest household income ($90k).

What matters to you?

Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.

MeasureWebsterEasthamptonGardnerClinton
People
Population
12,228Lowest
16,086
21,148Highest
15,563
Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census
+6.9%
MA: +7.4%
—
+5.2%Lowest
MA: +7.4%
+13.4%Highest
MA: +7.4%
Median age
37.2±2.1Lowest
7% below MA
46±2.6Highest
15% above MA
43.7±2.3
9% above MA
38.6±2.7
4% below MA
Easthampton and Gardner are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Kids under 18
21.8%±3.6Highest
MA: 19.4%
15.5%±2.4Lowest
MA: 19.4%
18.3%±2.3
MA: 19.4%
17.8%±2.5
MA: 19.4%
Webster and Gardner are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Age 65+
15.7%±2.5
MA: 17.9%
23.9%±3Highest
MA: 17.9%
19.6%±2.2
MA: 17.9%
14.5%±2.8Lowest
MA: 17.9%
Easthampton and Gardner are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+
18.8%Lowest
MA: 47.3%
38%Highest
MA: 47.3%
23.8%
MA: 47.3%
36.6%
MA: 47.3%
Enrolled in collegeshare of residents
6%±1.8
MA: 7.9%
6.1%±1.9
MA: 7.9%
4.6%±1.3Lowest
MA: 7.9%
6.9%±2Highest
MA: 7.9%
Clinton and Easthampton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Cost of living
Household incomemedian
$63,837±$8kLowest
39% below MA
$71,673±$7k
31% below MA
$67,518±$8k
35% below MA
$89,781±$10kHighest
14% below MA
Home valuemedian, owner-occupied
$333,100±$14k
41% below MA
$371,500±$15k
34% below MA
$301,600±$20kLowest
46% below MA
$387,300±$19kHighest
31% below MA
Clinton and Easthampton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Rentmedian gross, monthly
$1,198±$85
32% below MA
$1,292±$70
27% below MA
$1,109±$51Lowest
37% below MA
$1,402±$76Highest
20% below MA
Clinton and Easthampton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Property taxmedian, yearly
$3,234Lowest
46% below MA
$4,932Highest
18% below MA
$4,150
31% below MA
$4,654
22% below MA
Renters paying 30%+of income on rent
46.1%±7.4
MA: 51.8%
45.5%±10.7
MA: 51.8%
49.7%±8.6Highest
MA: 51.8%
40.3%±6.4Lowest
MA: 51.8%
Gardner and Webster are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Below poverty line
16%Highest
MA: 10%
8%Lowest
MA: 10%
13.7%
MA: 10%
8.6%
MA: 10%
Housing
Homeownersof occupied homes
45.5%Lowest
MA: 62.5%
58.4%
MA: 62.5%
58.9%Highest
MA: 62.5%
54.7%
MA: 62.5%
Typical home builtmedian year
1954Lowest
10 yrs older than MA
1966Highest
2 yrs newer than MA
1954Lowest
10 yrs older than MA
1956
8 yrs older than MA
Getting to work
Average commuteone way
28 min
5% below MA
22 minLowest
23% below MA
31 minHighest
5% above MA
30 min
about the MA average
Work from home
7.1%±2.9Lowest
MA: 18.6%
19%±3.2Highest
MA: 18.6%
13.3%±3.6
MA: 18.6%
14.2%±4.2
MA: 18.6%
Easthampton and Clinton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Schools
Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading #271 of 282 in MA #92 of 282 in MA #273 of 282 in MA #246 of 282 in MA
School district — Easthampton Gardner Clinton
High school in town — Easthampton High Gardner High Clinton Senior High
Students per teacherat that high school —
9.8Lowest
13.5Highest
12.8
On TownTapestry
Old photos in History None yet None yet None yet None yet

MA average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.