Compare towns
Webster vs Danielson vs Gardner
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Webster has grown the fastest since 2010 (+6.9%).
Danielson has the most affordable homes ($225k median).
Gardner has the most people working from home (13.3%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Webster | Danielson | Gardner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 12,228 |
4,209Lowest |
21,148Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +6.9%Highest U.S.: +7.4% |
+2.6%Lowest U.S.: +7.4% |
+5.2% U.S.: +7.4% |
| Median age | 37.2±2.1 4% below U.S. |
34.5±3.6Lowest 11% below U.S. |
43.7±2.3Highest 12% above U.S. |
| Kids under 18 | 21.8%±3.6Highest U.S.: 22% |
18.9%±6.1 U.S.: 22% |
18.3%±2.3Lowest U.S.: 22% |
| Webster and Danielson are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 15.7%±2.5 U.S.: 17.2% |
13.6%±4.9Lowest U.S.: 17.2% |
19.6%±2.2Highest U.S.: 17.2% |
| Gardner and Webster are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 18.8% U.S.: 35.7% |
11.5%Lowest U.S.: 35.7% |
23.8%Highest U.S.: 35.7% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 6%±1.8 U.S.: 6.4% |
9.2%±6.6Highest U.S.: 6.4% |
4.6%±1.3Lowest U.S.: 6.4% |
| Danielson and Webster are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $63,837±$8kLowest 21% below U.S. |
$64,050±$15k 21% below U.S. |
$67,518±$8kHighest 16% below U.S. |
| Gardner and Danielson are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $333,100±$14kHighest about the U.S. average |
$224,600±$13kLowest 32% below U.S. |
$301,600±$20k 9% below U.S. |
| Webster and Gardner are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,198±$85 15% below U.S. |
$1,235±$194Highest 13% below U.S. |
$1,109±$51Lowest 22% below U.S. |
| Danielson and Webster are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $3,234Lowest 4% above U.S. |
$4,009 29% above U.S. |
$4,150Highest 33% above U.S. |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 46.1%±7.4 U.S.: 51.1% |
44.7%±17.1Lowest U.S.: 51.1% |
49.7%±8.6Highest U.S.: 51.1% |
| Gardner and Webster are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 16% U.S.: 12.5% |
21.1%Highest U.S.: 12.5% |
13.7%Lowest U.S.: 12.5% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 45.5%Lowest U.S.: 65.2% |
53% U.S.: 65.2% |
58.9%Highest U.S.: 65.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1954Highest 26 yrs older than U.S. |
1951Lowest 29 yrs older than U.S. |
1954Highest 26 yrs older than U.S. |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 28 minLowest 4% above U.S. |
28 min 8% above U.S. |
31 minHighest 16% above U.S. |
| Work from home | 7.1%±2.9 U.S.: 15.1% |
6.6%±5.3Lowest U.S.: 15.1% |
13.3%±3.6Highest U.S.: 15.1% |
| Gardner and Webster are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #271 of 282 in MA | — | #273 of 282 in MA |
| School district | — | — | Gardner |
| High school in town | — | — | Gardner High |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | — | 13.5 |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.