Compare towns
Weare vs Alton vs Epping
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against New Hampshire.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Weare has the most kids (22.4% under 18).
Alton has the oldest population (median age 53.7).
Epping has the most renters (13.7% rent).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Weare | Alton | Epping |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 9,170Highest |
5,994Lowest |
7,430 |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +3.5%Lowest NH: +4.6% |
+12.3%Highest NH: +4.6% |
+11.1% NH: +4.6% |
| Median age | 45.6±4 5% above NH |
53.7±3.2Highest 24% above NH |
45.1±3.5Lowest 4% above NH |
| Kids under 18 | 22.4%±4Highest NH: 18.2% |
13.4%±4Lowest NH: 18.2% |
18.7%±4.8 NH: 18.2% |
| Weare and Epping are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 13.5%±3Lowest NH: 20.1% |
25.1%±4.5Highest NH: 20.1% |
22.6%±5.2 NH: 20.1% |
| Alton and Epping are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 41.2%Highest NH: 40.6% |
35.8%Lowest NH: 40.6% |
37% NH: 40.6% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 4.3%±1.4 NH: 6% |
0.8%±0.8Lowest NH: 6% |
5.1%±3.3Highest NH: 6% |
| Epping and Weare are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $118,271±$17kHighest 19% above NH |
$113,715±$19k 15% above NH |
$104,220±$7kLowest 5% above NH |
| Weare and Alton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $396,300±$26kLowest about the NH average |
$430,400±$37k 7% above NH |
$436,900±$35kHighest 9% above NH |
| Epping and Alton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,541±$214Lowest 3% above NH |
— | $1,742±$576Highest 17% above NH |
| Epping and Weare are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $6,272 6% below NH |
$4,183Lowest 37% below NH |
$6,936Highest 4% above NH |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 62.2%±24.6 NH: 48.2% |
31.7%±27.7Lowest NH: 48.2% |
67.8%±25.9Highest NH: 48.2% |
| Epping and Weare are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 1.4%Lowest NH: 7.2% |
4.1% NH: 7.2% |
4.7%Highest NH: 7.2% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 93.5% NH: 72.8% |
93.7%Highest NH: 72.8% |
86.3%Lowest NH: 72.8% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1986 7 yrs newer than NH |
1974Lowest 5 yrs older than NH |
1989Highest 10 yrs newer than NH |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 36 minHighest 34% above NH |
33 min 24% above NH |
32 minLowest 21% above NH |
| Work from home | 22.8%±4.9 NH: 16.8% |
13.1%±5.2Lowest NH: 16.8% |
24%±6.9Highest NH: 16.8% |
| Epping and Weare are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #84 of 120 in NH | #72 of 120 in NH | #77 of 120 in NH |
| School district | John Stark Regional School District · Weare School District | Prospect Mountain JMA School District · Alton School District | Epping School District |
| High school in town | John Stark Regional High School | Prospect Mountain High School | Epping High School |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 11.4Highest |
11.1 |
9.3Lowest |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | None yet |
NH average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.