Compare towns
Warwick vs Wrentham vs Cranston
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Warwick has the most affordable homes ($355k median).
Wrentham has grown the fastest since 2010 (+11.2%).
Cranston has the youngest population (median age 39.6).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Warwick | Wrentham | Cranston |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 83,175 |
12,297Lowest |
83,250Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +0.2%Lowest U.S.: +7.4% |
+11.2%Highest U.S.: +7.4% |
+3.2% U.S.: +7.4% |
| Median age | 44.3±1 14% above U.S. |
46.8±3.2Highest 20% above U.S. |
39.6±0.9Lowest about the U.S. average |
| Wrentham and Warwick are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 17.6%±1.1Lowest U.S.: 22% |
19.8%±2.4Highest U.S.: 22% |
19.6%±1.4 U.S.: 22% |
| Wrentham and Cranston are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 21.6%±1.2 U.S.: 17.2% |
21.7%±2.5Highest U.S.: 17.2% |
16.8%±1.1Lowest U.S.: 17.2% |
| Wrentham and Warwick are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 33.7%Lowest U.S.: 35.7% |
55.1%Highest U.S.: 35.7% |
36.4% U.S.: 35.7% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 5.6%±0.7 U.S.: 6.4% |
5.2%±1.4Lowest U.S.: 6.4% |
6.3%±0.8Highest U.S.: 6.4% |
| Cranston and Warwick are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $88,708±$6kLowest 10% above U.S. |
$151,676±$17kHighest 88% above U.S. |
$90,206±$4k 12% above U.S. |
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $354,600±$5kLowest 7% above U.S. |
$654,900±$26kHighest 97% above U.S. |
$378,300±$7k 14% above U.S. |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,363±$76 4% below U.S. |
$1,184±$628Lowest 16% below U.S. |
$1,375±$59Highest about the U.S. average |
| Cranston and Warwick are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $4,616Lowest 48% above U.S. |
$7,373Highest 136% above U.S. |
$5,103 64% above U.S. |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 53.1%±6.1Highest U.S.: 51.1% |
40.6%±15.4Lowest U.S.: 51.1% |
47.3%±6 U.S.: 51.1% |
| Warwick and Cranston are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 7.6% U.S.: 12.5% |
6.9%Lowest U.S.: 12.5% |
10.2%Highest U.S.: 12.5% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 73.3% U.S.: 65.2% |
82%Highest U.S.: 65.2% |
67.6%Lowest U.S.: 65.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1961 19 yrs older than U.S. |
1984Highest 4 yrs newer than U.S. |
1958Lowest 22 yrs older than U.S. |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 25 min 7% below U.S. |
32 minHighest 22% above U.S. |
24 minLowest 8% below U.S. |
| Work from home | 12.4%±1.2Lowest U.S.: 15.1% |
21.9%±4Highest U.S.: 15.1% |
13%±1.2 U.S.: 15.1% |
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #28 of 38 in RI | #49 of 282 in MA | #27 of 38 in RI |
| School district | Warwick | King Philip · Wrentham | Achievement First Rhode Island · Cranston |
| High school in town | Pilgrim High School | King Philip Regional High | Cranston High School West |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 10.5Lowest |
13.5 |
15.4Highest |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.