Compare towns
Warren vs Whitingham vs Fayston
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Warren has grown the fastest since 2010 (+16%).
Whitingham has the most affordable homes ($262k median).
Fayston has the highest household income ($110k).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Warren | Whitingham | Fayston |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 1,585Highest |
1,368 |
1,342Lowest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +16%Highest VT: +2.8% |
-1%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
+0.8% VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 53.1±4.2Highest 23% above VT |
46.4±7.1Lowest 8% above VT |
46.9±3.5 9% above VT |
| Warren and Fayston are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 9.3%±3.1Lowest VT: 17.9% |
19.8%±4.5Highest VT: 17.9% |
19.3%±3.8 VT: 17.9% |
| Whitingham and Fayston are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 30.1%±4.9 VT: 21.4% |
31.1%±2.3Highest VT: 21.4% |
19.6%±3.8Lowest VT: 21.4% |
| Whitingham and Warren are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 60% VT: 43.8% |
32.8%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
66.9%Highest VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 3.6%±4Highest VT: 7% |
2.2%±1.9Lowest VT: 7% |
3.1%±1.8 VT: 7% |
| Warren and Fayston are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $86,905±$16k 7% above VT |
$70,625±$11kLowest 13% below VT |
$110,250±$28kHighest 36% above VT |
| Fayston and Warren are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $569,300±$123kHighest 80% above VT |
$262,300±$30kLowest 17% below VT |
$502,400±$82k 59% above VT |
| Warren and Fayston are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,750±$394Highest 42% above VT |
$673±$150Lowest 45% below VT |
$1,654±$274 34% above VT |
| Warren and Fayston are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $7,284Highest 45% above VT |
$5,055Lowest about the VT average |
$6,689 33% above VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 32.3%±26.6 VT: 48.4% |
62.7%±47.3Highest VT: 48.4% |
6.3%±27.9Lowest VT: 48.4% |
| Whitingham and Warren are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 15.7%Highest VT: 10.1% |
15.5% VT: 10.1% |
4.2%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 86.7% VT: 73.2% |
85.2%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
87%Highest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1977Highest 1 yr newer than VT |
1974Lowest 2 yrs older than VT |
1977Highest 1 yr newer than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 19 minLowest 21% below VT |
38 minHighest 62% above VT |
29 min 25% above VT |
| Work from home | 36.2%±5Highest VT: 16.9% |
9.7%±5.2Lowest VT: 16.9% |
26.2%±5.6 VT: 16.9% |
| Warren and Fayston are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| School district | Harwood Unified Union School District #60 | Twin Valley Unified School District #75 | Harwood Unified Union School District #60 |
| High school in town | None in town | Twin Valley Middle High School | None in town |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | 7.8 |
— |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.