Compare towns
Warren vs Whitingham vs Ware
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Warren has the most expensive homes ($334k median).
Whitingham has the most homeowners (85.2%).
Ware has grown the fastest since 2010 (+1.6%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Warren | Whitingham | Ware |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 5,009 |
1,368Lowest |
6,369Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -3.1%Lowest U.S.: +7.4% |
-1% U.S.: +7.4% |
+1.6%Highest U.S.: +7.4% |
| Median age | 38.7±7.3Lowest about the U.S. average |
46.4±7.1Highest 19% above U.S. |
39.8±6 about the U.S. average |
| Whitingham and Ware are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 20.8%±8 U.S.: 22% |
19.8%±4.5Lowest U.S.: 22% |
23.3%±4.4Highest U.S.: 22% |
| Ware and Warren are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 14.6%±4.5Lowest U.S.: 17.2% |
31.1%±2.3Highest U.S.: 17.2% |
17.4%±3.9 U.S.: 17.2% |
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 23.2% U.S.: 35.7% |
32.8%Highest U.S.: 35.7% |
15.4%Lowest U.S.: 35.7% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 2.9%±2.1 U.S.: 6.4% |
2.2%±1.9Lowest U.S.: 6.4% |
3.7%±1.9Highest U.S.: 6.4% |
| Ware and Warren are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $66,082±$6k 18% below U.S. |
$70,625±$11kHighest 13% below U.S. |
$45,158±$11kLowest 44% below U.S. |
| Whitingham and Warren are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $333,700±$35kHighest about the U.S. average |
$262,300±$30k 21% below U.S. |
$253,400±$31kLowest 24% below U.S. |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $890±$174 37% below U.S. |
$673±$150Lowest 52% below U.S. |
$1,039±$104Highest 26% below U.S. |
| Ware and Warren are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $4,530 45% above U.S. |
$5,055Highest 62% above U.S. |
$3,408Lowest 9% above U.S. |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 29.7%±18.4Lowest U.S.: 51.1% |
62.7%±47.3 U.S.: 51.1% |
64.5%±17.3Highest U.S.: 51.1% |
| Ware and Whitingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 9%Lowest U.S.: 12.5% |
15.5%Highest U.S.: 12.5% |
14.1% U.S.: 12.5% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 64.5% U.S.: 65.2% |
85.2%Highest U.S.: 65.2% |
57.4%Lowest U.S.: 65.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1975Highest 5 yrs older than U.S. |
1974 6 yrs older than U.S. |
1938Lowest 42 yrs older than U.S. |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 33 min 25% above U.S. |
38 minHighest 44% above U.S. |
27 minLowest about the U.S. average |
| Work from home | 8.5%±5.4Lowest U.S.: 15.1% |
9.7%±5.2 U.S.: 15.1% |
16.6%±5Highest U.S.: 15.1% |
| Ware and Whitingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #165 of 282 in MA | — | #267 of 282 in MA |
| School district | Quaboag Regional | Twin Valley Unified School District #75 | — |
| High school in town | Quaboag Regional High | Twin Valley Middle High School | — |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 10.0Highest |
7.8Lowest |
— |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.

