Compare towns
Warner vs Windham vs Rollinsford
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against New Hampshire.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Warner has the most affordable homes ($353k median).
Windham has grown the fastest since 2010 (+16.4%).
Rollinsford has the most people working from home (25.9%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Warner | Windham | Rollinsford |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 2,959 |
16,038Highest |
2,626Lowest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +3.7% NH: +4.6% |
+16.4%Highest NH: +4.6% |
+2.8%Lowest NH: +4.6% |
| Median age | 43.7±4Highest about the NH average |
41.1±2.9 5% below NH |
38.8±5.5Lowest 10% below NH |
| Warner and Windham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 17.3%±3.3Lowest NH: 18.2% |
27.4%±3.3Highest NH: 18.2% |
17.7%±4.8 NH: 18.2% |
| Age 65+ | 20.4%±3.5Highest NH: 20.1% |
15.5%±2.6Lowest NH: 20.1% |
19.8%±4.9 NH: 20.1% |
| Warner and Rollinsford are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 42.4% NH: 40.6% |
62.7%Highest NH: 40.6% |
41.2%Lowest NH: 40.6% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 5.3%±1.6Highest NH: 6% |
3.8%±1.8 NH: 6% |
2.8%±1.5Lowest NH: 6% |
| Warner and Windham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $94,022±$18k 5% below NH |
$189,583±$19kHighest 91% above NH |
$89,500±$26kLowest 10% below NH |
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $353,100±$22kLowest 12% below NH |
$723,300±$50kHighest 80% above NH |
$398,100±$33k about the NH average |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,219±$123Lowest 18% below NH |
$3,218±$350Highest 116% above NH |
$1,809±$394 21% above NH |
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $7,650 15% above NH |
$10,000+Highest at least 50% above NH |
$6,851Lowest about the NH average |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 48.7%±21.3 NH: 48.2% |
52.2%±50.9Highest NH: 48.2% |
40%±26.1Lowest NH: 48.2% |
| Windham and Warner are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 8.4%Highest NH: 7.2% |
2%Lowest NH: 7.2% |
4.8% NH: 7.2% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 74.6%Lowest NH: 72.8% |
93.9%Highest NH: 72.8% |
78.2% NH: 72.8% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1975 4 yrs older than NH |
1996Highest 17 yrs newer than NH |
1966Lowest 13 yrs older than NH |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 32 minHighest 19% above NH |
31 min 15% above NH |
26 minLowest about the NH average |
| Work from home | 16.6%±4.8Lowest NH: 16.8% |
21.9%±4.4 NH: 16.8% |
25.9%±8.8Highest NH: 16.8% |
| Rollinsford and Windham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | — | #13 of 120 in NH | #94 of 120 in NH |
| School district | Kearsarge Regional School District | Windham School District | Rollinsford School District |
| High school in town | None in town | Windham High School | None in town |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | 12.8 |
— |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | None yet |
NH average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.