Compare towns

Wallingford vs Wolcott vs Worcester vs Whitingham

Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.

What stands out worked out from the figures below

Wallingford has grown the fastest since 2010 (+2.4%).
Wolcott has the most affordable homes ($221k median).
Worcester has the most people working from home (23.6%).

What matters to you?

Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.

MeasureWallingfordWolcottWorcesterWhitingham
People
Population
2,286Highest
1,507
831Lowest
1,368
Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census
+2.4%Highest
VT: +2.8%
-0.4%
VT: +2.8%
-3.4%Lowest
VT: +2.8%
-1%
VT: +2.8%
Median age
45.9±10.8
6% above VT
42.4±5.9Lowest
about the VT average
47±2.7Highest
9% above VT
46.4±7.1
8% above VT
Worcester and Whitingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Kids under 18
18.7%±5
VT: 17.9%
22.8%±5.2Highest
VT: 17.9%
12.8%±3.9Lowest
VT: 17.9%
19.8%±4.5
VT: 17.9%
Wolcott and Whitingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Age 65+
23.9%±3.2
VT: 21.4%
11.1%±2.4Lowest
VT: 21.4%
19.5%±2.5
VT: 21.4%
31.1%±2.3Highest
VT: 21.4%
Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+
30.3%Lowest
VT: 43.8%
31.1%
VT: 43.8%
53%Highest
VT: 43.8%
32.8%
VT: 43.8%
Enrolled in collegeshare of residents
1.5%±1.1Lowest
VT: 7%
3.4%±2.1
VT: 7%
6.9%±4.7Highest
VT: 7%
2.2%±1.9
VT: 7%
Worcester and Wolcott are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Cost of living
Household incomemedian
$80,230±$15kHighest
about the VT average
$70,259±$10kLowest
13% below VT
$73,833±$18k
9% below VT
$70,625±$11k
13% below VT
Wallingford and Worcester are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Home valuemedian, owner-occupied
$261,900±$44k
17% below VT
$221,300±$23kLowest
30% below VT
$271,100±$27kHighest
14% below VT
$262,300±$30k
17% below VT
Worcester and Whitingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Rentmedian gross, monthly
$891±$95
28% below VT
$1,059±$118Highest
14% below VT
$1,023±$136
17% below VT
$673±$150Lowest
45% below VT
Wolcott and Worcester are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Property taxmedian, yearly
$4,355
14% below VT
$3,930Lowest
22% below VT
$4,421
12% below VT
$5,055Highest
about the VT average
Renters paying 30%+of income on rent
14.3%±13.5Lowest
VT: 48.4%
75.7%±21.8Highest
VT: 48.4%
25.5%±37
VT: 48.4%
62.7%±47.3
VT: 48.4%
Wolcott and Whitingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Below poverty line
7%
VT: 10.1%
9.3%
VT: 10.1%
5.9%Lowest
VT: 10.1%
15.5%Highest
VT: 10.1%
Housing
Homeownersof occupied homes
82.5%
VT: 73.2%
79.5%Lowest
VT: 73.2%
85.9%Highest
VT: 73.2%
85.2%
VT: 73.2%
Typical home builtmedian year
1971Lowest
5 yrs older than VT
1983Highest
7 yrs newer than VT
1976
same as VT
1974
2 yrs older than VT
Getting to work
Average commuteone way
25 minLowest
6% above VT
27 min
13% above VT
29 min
22% above VT
38 minHighest
62% above VT
Work from home
7.1%±3.7Lowest
VT: 16.9%
13.9%±4.2
VT: 16.9%
23.6%±4.8Highest
VT: 16.9%
9.7%±5.2
VT: 16.9%
Schools
School district Mill River Unified Union School District #52 Wolcott School District Washington Central Unified Union School District #92 Twin Valley Unified School District #75
High school in town None in town None in town None in town Twin Valley Middle High School
Students per teacherat that high school — — —
7.8
On TownTapestry
Old photos in History None yet None yet None yet None yet

VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.