Compare towns
Wallingford vs Danby vs Cavendish
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Wallingford has grown the fastest since 2010 (+2.4%).
Danby has the oldest population (median age 52.6).
Cavendish has the most people working from home (18.5%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Wallingford | Danby | Cavendish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 2,286Highest |
1,133Lowest |
1,242 |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +2.4%Highest VT: +2.8% |
-2.1%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
+1.8% VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 45.9±10.8 6% above VT |
52.6±4.8Highest 22% above VT |
45.2±5.9Lowest 5% above VT |
| Danby and Wallingford are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 18.7%±5Highest VT: 17.9% |
14.6%±3.4Lowest VT: 17.9% |
18.3%±4.8 VT: 17.9% |
| Wallingford and Cavendish are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 23.9%±3.2 VT: 21.4% |
24.3%±2.6Highest VT: 21.4% |
23.6%±2Lowest VT: 21.4% |
| Danby and Wallingford are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 30.3%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
34.8% VT: 43.8% |
39.3%Highest VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 1.5%±1.1Lowest VT: 7% |
2.5%±1.9 VT: 7% |
4.3%±1.9Highest VT: 7% |
| Cavendish and Danby are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $80,230±$15k about the VT average |
$77,321±$13kLowest 5% below VT |
$89,063±$29kHighest 10% above VT |
| Cavendish and Wallingford are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $261,900±$44kLowest 17% below VT |
$272,400±$41k 14% below VT |
$285,100±$40kHighest 10% below VT |
| Cavendish and Danby are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $891±$95 28% below VT |
$794±$166Lowest 36% below VT |
$1,000±$546Highest 19% below VT |
| Cavendish and Wallingford are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $4,355 14% below VT |
$4,543Highest 10% below VT |
$3,948Lowest 22% below VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 14.3%±13.5Lowest VT: 48.4% |
41.4%±34.6Highest VT: 48.4% |
28.9%±27 VT: 48.4% |
| Danby and Cavendish are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 7% VT: 10.1% |
9.4%Highest VT: 10.1% |
6.3%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 82.5% VT: 73.2% |
89.3%Highest VT: 73.2% |
81.3%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1971 5 yrs older than VT |
1981Highest 5 yrs newer than VT |
1968Lowest 8 yrs older than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 25 min 6% above VT |
30 minHighest 26% above VT |
19 minLowest 21% below VT |
| Work from home | 7.1%±3.7Lowest VT: 16.9% |
12.1%±5.1 VT: 16.9% |
18.5%±6.6Highest VT: 16.9% |
| Cavendish and Danby are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| School district | Mill River Unified Union School District #52 | Taconic and Green Regional School District #63 | Green Mountain Unified School District #77 |
| High school in town | None in town | None in town | None in town |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.