Compare towns
Walden vs Reading vs Randolph
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Walden has the most affordable homes ($239k median).
Reading has grown the fastest since 2010 (+3.2%).
Randolph has the most renters (32.8% rent).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Walden | Reading | Randolph |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 1,037 |
699Lowest |
4,843Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +2.2% VT: +2.8% |
+3.2%Highest VT: +2.8% |
-0.1%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 48.8±3.2 13% above VT |
51.1±7.6Highest 19% above VT |
40.4±7.4Lowest 6% below VT |
| Reading and Walden are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 14.3%±3.9Lowest VT: 17.9% |
18.5%±4.2Highest VT: 17.9% |
17.3%±4.4 VT: 17.9% |
| Reading and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 20.4%±2.6Lowest VT: 21.4% |
28.2%±3.3Highest VT: 21.4% |
22.9%±4.2 VT: 21.4% |
| Reading and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 26.4%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
46%Highest VT: 43.8% |
40.8% VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 4%±2.1 VT: 7% |
3.1%±2.5Lowest VT: 7% |
11.2%±2.5Highest VT: 7% |
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $88,000±$15kHighest 8% above VT |
$85,000±$19k 5% above VT |
$76,758±$6kLowest 5% below VT |
| Walden and Reading are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $238,900±$23kLowest 25% below VT |
$377,200±$72kHighest 19% above VT |
$278,700±$38k 12% below VT |
| Reading and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $900±$136Lowest 27% below VT |
$1,100±$331 11% below VT |
$1,172±$173Highest 5% below VT |
| Randolph and Reading are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $3,944Lowest 22% below VT |
$5,754Highest 14% above VT |
$4,698 7% below VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 56.3%±86.8 VT: 48.4% |
63.3%±31.7Highest VT: 48.4% |
54.1%±17.8Lowest VT: 48.4% |
| Reading and Walden are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 9.3%Highest VT: 10.1% |
8.4% VT: 10.1% |
7.7%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 93.8%Highest VT: 73.2% |
84.9% VT: 73.2% |
67.2%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1983Highest 7 yrs newer than VT |
1969Lowest 7 yrs older than VT |
1971 5 yrs older than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 26 min 10% above VT |
33 minHighest 41% above VT |
21 minLowest 12% below VT |
| Work from home | 21.4%±6.7 VT: 16.9% |
22.9%±10.6Highest VT: 16.9% |
12.9%±4.7Lowest VT: 16.9% |
| Reading and Walden are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | — | — | #55 of 70 in VT |
| School district | Caledonia Cooperative Unified School District #78 | Mountain Views Unified Union School District #76 | Orange Southwest Unified Union School District #59 |
| High school in town | None in town | None in town | Randolph Union High School |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | — | 9.4 |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.