Compare towns
Underhill vs Worcester vs Lincoln
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Underhill has the most kids (27.8% under 18).
Worcester has the most affordable homes ($271k median).
Lincoln has grown the fastest since 2010 (+4.1%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Underhill | Worcester | Lincoln |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 3,141Highest |
831Lowest |
1,394 |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +3.7% VT: +2.8% |
-3.4%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
+4.1%Highest VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 38.1±11.4Lowest 12% below VT |
47±2.7Highest 9% above VT |
45.7±3.6 6% above VT |
| Worcester and Lincoln are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 27.8%±10.9Highest VT: 17.9% |
12.8%±3.9Lowest VT: 17.9% |
15.1%±3.7 VT: 17.9% |
| Underhill and Lincoln are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 17.6%±6Lowest VT: 21.4% |
19.5%±2.5 VT: 21.4% |
22.3%±3Highest VT: 21.4% |
| Lincoln and Worcester are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 50.1% VT: 43.8% |
53%Highest VT: 43.8% |
43.5%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 3.5%±2 VT: 7% |
6.9%±4.7Highest VT: 7% |
2.9%±2.1Lowest VT: 7% |
| Worcester and Underhill are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $92,267±$54k 14% above VT |
$73,833±$18kLowest 9% below VT |
$96,667±$18kHighest 19% above VT |
| Lincoln and Underhill are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $446,000±$24kHighest 41% above VT |
$271,100±$27kLowest 14% below VT |
$365,200±$30k 15% above VT |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | — | $1,023±$136Highest 17% below VT |
$870±$47Lowest 29% below VT |
| Worcester and Lincoln are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $6,697Highest 33% above VT |
$4,421Lowest 12% below VT |
$6,100 21% above VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 0%±18.2Lowest VT: 48.4% |
25.5%±37 VT: 48.4% |
49.1%±25.5Highest VT: 48.4% |
| Lincoln and Worcester are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 6.4% VT: 10.1% |
5.9%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
7.5%Highest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 79.8%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
85.9% VT: 73.2% |
88.1%Highest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1979Highest 3 yrs newer than VT |
1976Lowest same as VT |
1977 1 yr newer than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 33 minHighest 39% above VT |
29 minLowest 22% above VT |
30 min 26% above VT |
| Work from home | 19.4%±11.3 VT: 16.9% |
23.6%±4.8Highest VT: 16.9% |
18.8%±5.6Lowest VT: 16.9% |
| Worcester and Underhill are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #2 of 70 in VT | — | — |
| School district | Mount Mansfield Unified Union School District #401 | Washington Central Unified Union School District #92 | Lincoln Town School District |
| High school in town | None in town | None in town | None in town |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.