Compare towns
Underhill vs Wallingford vs Cambridge
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Underhill has the most people working from home (19.4%).
Wallingford has the most affordable homes ($262k median).
Cambridge has grown the fastest since 2010 (+4.9%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Underhill | Wallingford | Cambridge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 3,141 |
2,286Lowest |
3,767Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +3.7% VT: +2.8% |
+2.4%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
+4.9%Highest VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 38.1±11.4 12% below VT |
45.9±10.8Highest 6% above VT |
37.4±1.8Lowest 13% below VT |
| Wallingford and Underhill are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 27.8%±10.9Highest VT: 17.9% |
18.7%±5Lowest VT: 17.9% |
23%±4.9 VT: 17.9% |
| Underhill and Cambridge are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 17.6%±6 VT: 21.4% |
23.9%±3.2Highest VT: 21.4% |
14.4%±3.5Lowest VT: 21.4% |
| Wallingford and Underhill are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 50.1% VT: 43.8% |
30.3%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
50.7%Highest VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 3.5%±2Highest VT: 7% |
1.5%±1.1Lowest VT: 7% |
1.9%±1.2 VT: 7% |
| Underhill and Cambridge are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $92,267±$54kHighest 14% above VT |
$80,230±$15k about the VT average |
$72,344±$19kLowest 11% below VT |
| Underhill and Wallingford are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $446,000±$24kHighest 41% above VT |
$261,900±$44kLowest 17% below VT |
$343,000±$38k 8% above VT |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | — | $891±$95Lowest 28% below VT |
$1,183±$66Highest 4% below VT |
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $6,697Highest 33% above VT |
$4,355Lowest 14% below VT |
$4,910 about the VT average |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 0%±18.2Lowest VT: 48.4% |
14.3%±13.5 VT: 48.4% |
66.6%±7.3Highest VT: 48.4% |
| Below poverty line | 6.4%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
7%Highest VT: 10.1% |
6.7% VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 79.8% VT: 73.2% |
82.5%Highest VT: 73.2% |
70.3%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1979 3 yrs newer than VT |
1971Lowest 5 yrs older than VT |
1985Highest 9 yrs newer than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 33 minHighest 39% above VT |
25 minLowest 6% above VT |
32 min 38% above VT |
| Work from home | 19.4%±11.3Highest VT: 16.9% |
7.1%±3.7Lowest VT: 16.9% |
9.9%±4.1 VT: 16.9% |
| Underhill and Cambridge are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #2 of 70 in VT | — | #25 of 70 in VT |
| School district | Mount Mansfield Unified Union School District #401 | Mill River Unified Union School District #52 | Cambridge School District |
| High school in town | None in town | None in town | None in town |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.