Compare towns
Underhill vs Sutton vs Randolph
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Underhill has grown the fastest since 2010 (+3.7%).
Sutton has the most affordable homes ($231k median).
Randolph has the shortest commute (21 min average).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Underhill | Sutton | Randolph |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 3,141 |
790Lowest |
4,843Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +3.7%Highest VT: +2.8% |
-11.3%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
-0.1% VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 38.1±11.4Lowest 12% below VT |
46.6±5.7Highest 8% above VT |
40.4±7.4 6% below VT |
| Sutton and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 27.8%±10.9Highest VT: 17.9% |
17.3%±3.4Lowest VT: 17.9% |
17.3%±4.4Lowest VT: 17.9% |
| Underhill and Sutton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 17.6%±6Lowest VT: 21.4% |
21.6%±2.7 VT: 21.4% |
22.9%±4.2Highest VT: 21.4% |
| Randolph and Sutton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 50.1%Highest VT: 43.8% |
32.8%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
40.8% VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 3.5%±2 VT: 7% |
2.3%±1.8Lowest VT: 7% |
11.2%±2.5Highest VT: 7% |
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $92,267±$54kHighest 14% above VT |
$71,250±$18kLowest 12% below VT |
$76,758±$6k 5% below VT |
| Underhill and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $446,000±$24kHighest 41% above VT |
$231,100±$41kLowest 27% below VT |
$278,700±$38k 12% below VT |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | — | — | $1,172±$173 5% below VT |
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $6,697Highest 33% above VT |
$3,975Lowest 21% below VT |
$4,698 7% below VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 0%±18.2Lowest VT: 48.4% |
37.8%±31.1 VT: 48.4% |
54.1%±17.8Highest VT: 48.4% |
| Randolph and Sutton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 6.4%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
12.4%Highest VT: 10.1% |
7.7% VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 79.8% VT: 73.2% |
85%Highest VT: 73.2% |
67.2%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1979Highest 3 yrs newer than VT |
1979Highest 3 yrs newer than VT |
1971Lowest 5 yrs older than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 33 minHighest 39% above VT |
30 min 26% above VT |
21 minLowest 12% below VT |
| Work from home | 19.4%±11.3Highest VT: 16.9% |
11.6%±5.3Lowest VT: 16.9% |
12.9%±4.7 VT: 16.9% |
| Underhill and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #2 of 70 in VT | — | #55 of 70 in VT |
| School district | Mount Mansfield Unified Union School District #401 | Kingdom East Unified Union School District #64 | Orange Southwest Unified Union School District #59 |
| High school in town | None in town | None in town | Randolph Union High School |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | — | 9.4 |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.