Compare towns
Underhill vs Enosburgh vs Worcester
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Underhill has the most expensive homes ($446k median).
Enosburgh has the most affordable homes ($223k median).
Worcester has the most people working from home (23.6%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Underhill | Enosburgh | Worcester |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 3,141Highest |
2,804 |
831Lowest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +3.7%Highest VT: +2.8% |
— | -3.4%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 38.1±11.4Lowest 12% below VT |
40.6±3.9 6% below VT |
47±2.7Highest 9% above VT |
| Worcester and Enosburgh are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 27.8%±10.9Highest VT: 17.9% |
21%±4.2 VT: 17.9% |
12.8%±3.9Lowest VT: 17.9% |
| Underhill and Enosburgh are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 17.6%±6Lowest VT: 21.4% |
17.9%±3.3 VT: 21.4% |
19.5%±2.5Highest VT: 21.4% |
| Worcester and Enosburgh are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 50.1% VT: 43.8% |
20.1%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
53%Highest VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 3.5%±2Lowest VT: 7% |
5.4%±2.4 VT: 7% |
6.9%±4.7Highest VT: 7% |
| Worcester and Enosburgh are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $92,267±$54kHighest 14% above VT |
$63,828±$17kLowest 21% below VT |
$73,833±$18k 9% below VT |
| Underhill and Worcester are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $446,000±$24kHighest 41% above VT |
$223,100±$39kLowest 30% below VT |
$271,100±$27k 14% below VT |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | — | $852±$87Lowest 31% below VT |
$1,023±$136Highest 17% below VT |
| Worcester and Enosburgh are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $6,697Highest 33% above VT |
$3,624Lowest 28% below VT |
$4,421 12% below VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 0%±18.2Lowest VT: 48.4% |
48.9%±11.2Highest VT: 48.4% |
25.5%±37 VT: 48.4% |
| Enosburgh and Worcester are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 6.4% VT: 10.1% |
13.9%Highest VT: 10.1% |
5.9%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 79.8% VT: 73.2% |
75.7%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
85.9%Highest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1979Highest 3 yrs newer than VT |
1972Lowest 4 yrs older than VT |
1976 same as VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 33 minHighest 39% above VT |
32 min 36% above VT |
29 minLowest 22% above VT |
| Work from home | 19.4%±11.3 VT: 16.9% |
10.1%±4.4Lowest VT: 16.9% |
23.6%±4.8Highest VT: 16.9% |
| Worcester and Underhill are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #2 of 70 in VT | #26 of 70 in VT | — |
| School district | Mount Mansfield Unified Union School District #401 | Enosburgh-Richford Unified Union School District #88 | Washington Central Unified Union School District #92 |
| High school in town | None in town | Enosburg Falls Middle/High School | None in town |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | 10.4 |
— |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.