Compare towns
Tunbridge vs Whitingham vs Salisbury
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Tunbridge has the most people working from home (25.8%).
Whitingham has the most affordable homes ($262k median).
Salisbury has grown the fastest since 2010 (+7.5%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Tunbridge | Whitingham | Salisbury |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 1,253 |
1,368Highest |
1,200Lowest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +4.1% VT: +2.8% |
-1%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
+7.5%Highest VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 42.7±8.3Lowest about the VT average |
46.4±7.1 8% above VT |
50.6±6.5Highest 17% above VT |
| Salisbury and Whitingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 21.1%±4.4Highest VT: 17.9% |
19.8%±4.5 VT: 17.9% |
16.6%±3.2Lowest VT: 17.9% |
| Tunbridge and Whitingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 20.9%±1.6Lowest VT: 21.4% |
31.1%±2.3Highest VT: 21.4% |
30.4%±2.9 VT: 21.4% |
| Whitingham and Salisbury are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 42.9%Highest VT: 43.8% |
32.8%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
34.6% VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 3.6%±2Highest VT: 7% |
2.2%±1.9 VT: 7% |
1.6%±1.1Lowest VT: 7% |
| Tunbridge and Whitingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $89,464±$26k 10% above VT |
$70,625±$11kLowest 13% below VT |
$99,688±$21kHighest 23% above VT |
| Salisbury and Tunbridge are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $315,300±$23kHighest about the VT average |
$262,300±$30kLowest 17% below VT |
$306,900±$51k 3% below VT |
| Tunbridge and Salisbury are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,346±$128 9% above VT |
$673±$150Lowest 45% below VT |
$1,443±$984Highest 17% above VT |
| Salisbury and Tunbridge are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $4,645Lowest 8% below VT |
$5,055Highest about the VT average |
$4,842 4% below VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 76.7%±100Highest VT: 48.4% |
62.7%±47.3 VT: 48.4% |
31.9%±22.6Lowest VT: 48.4% |
| Tunbridge and Whitingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 14.4% VT: 10.1% |
15.5%Highest VT: 10.1% |
4.6%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 84.2%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
85.2% VT: 73.2% |
88.7%Highest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1981Highest 5 yrs newer than VT |
1974 2 yrs older than VT |
1967Lowest 9 yrs older than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 31 min 31% above VT |
38 minHighest 62% above VT |
19 minLowest 20% below VT |
| Work from home | 25.8%±8.2Highest VT: 16.9% |
9.7%±5.2 VT: 16.9% |
6%±2.2Lowest VT: 16.9% |
| Schools | |||
| School district | First Branch Unified School District #82 | Twin Valley Unified School District #75 | Addison Central Unified Union School District #55 |
| High school in town | None in town | Twin Valley Middle High School | None in town |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | 7.8 |
— |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.