Compare towns
Tunbridge vs White River Junction vs Marshfield
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Tunbridge has the highest household income ($89k).
White River Junction has grown the fastest since 2010 (+10.8%).
Marshfield has the most affordable homes ($214k median).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Tunbridge | White River Junction | Marshfield |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 1,253Lowest |
3,364Highest |
1,863 |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +4.1% VT: +2.8% |
+10.8%Highest VT: +2.8% |
-0.3%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 42.7±8.3Highest about the VT average |
33.7±3.2Lowest 22% below VT |
38.7±6.1 10% below VT |
| Tunbridge and Marshfield are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 21.1%±4.4 VT: 17.9% |
17.1%±5Lowest VT: 17.9% |
24.2%±2.9Highest VT: 17.9% |
| Marshfield and Tunbridge are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 20.9%±1.6Highest VT: 21.4% |
12.5%±3.6Lowest VT: 21.4% |
17.8%±2.1 VT: 21.4% |
| Tunbridge and Marshfield are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 42.9%Highest VT: 43.8% |
38.9% VT: 43.8% |
38.5%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 3.6%±2Highest VT: 7% |
1.2%±1.1Lowest VT: 7% |
2.7%±1.4 VT: 7% |
| Tunbridge and Marshfield are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $89,464±$26kHighest 10% above VT |
$77,168±$4k 5% below VT |
$60,313±$10kLowest 26% below VT |
| Tunbridge and White River Junction are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $315,300±$23kHighest about the VT average |
$278,800±$78k 12% below VT |
$214,100±$37kLowest 32% below VT |
| Tunbridge and White River Junction are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,346±$128Highest 9% above VT |
$1,222±$216Lowest about the VT average |
$1,317±$126 7% above VT |
| Tunbridge and Marshfield are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $4,645 8% below VT |
$5,651Highest 12% above VT |
$3,668Lowest 27% below VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 76.7%±100Highest VT: 48.4% |
42.9%±17.3Lowest VT: 48.4% |
65.7%±73.8 VT: 48.4% |
| Tunbridge and Marshfield are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 14.4%Highest VT: 10.1% |
12.1% VT: 10.1% |
9.2%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 84.2% VT: 73.2% |
43.9%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
84.7%Highest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1981Highest 5 yrs newer than VT |
1963Lowest 13 yrs older than VT |
1972 4 yrs older than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 31 minHighest 31% above VT |
15 minLowest 35% below VT |
29 min 23% above VT |
| Work from home | 25.8%±8.2Highest VT: 16.9% |
15.7%±5.8Lowest VT: 16.9% |
24.5%±7.5 VT: 16.9% |
| Tunbridge and Marshfield are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| School district | First Branch Unified School District #82 | — | — |
| High school in town | None in town | — | — |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.