Compare towns
Tunbridge vs Ludlow vs Reading
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Tunbridge has the youngest population (median age 42.7).
Ludlow has grown the fastest since 2010 (+10.6%).
Reading has the most expensive homes ($377k median).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Tunbridge | Ludlow | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 1,253 |
1,990Highest |
699Lowest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +4.1% VT: +2.8% |
+10.6%Highest VT: +2.8% |
+3.2%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 42.7±8.3Lowest about the VT average |
52.2±6.2Highest 21% above VT |
51.1±7.6 19% above VT |
| Ludlow and Reading are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 21.1%±4.4Highest VT: 17.9% |
14.1%±6Lowest VT: 17.9% |
18.5%±4.2 VT: 17.9% |
| Tunbridge and Reading are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 20.9%±1.6Lowest VT: 21.4% |
31.1%±2Highest VT: 21.4% |
28.2%±3.3 VT: 21.4% |
| Ludlow and Reading are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 42.9%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
45.1% VT: 43.8% |
46%Highest VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 3.6%±2 VT: 7% |
5.8%±6.4Highest VT: 7% |
3.1%±2.5Lowest VT: 7% |
| Ludlow and Tunbridge are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $89,464±$26kHighest 10% above VT |
$54,885±$14kLowest 32% below VT |
$85,000±$19k 5% above VT |
| Tunbridge and Reading are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $315,300±$23kLowest about the VT average |
$370,200±$46k 17% above VT |
$377,200±$72kHighest 19% above VT |
| Reading and Ludlow are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,346±$128Highest 9% above VT |
$1,112±$151 10% below VT |
$1,100±$331Lowest 11% below VT |
| Tunbridge and Ludlow are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $4,645Lowest 8% below VT |
$4,890 about the VT average |
$5,754Highest 14% above VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 76.7%±100Highest VT: 48.4% |
45.2%±25.2Lowest VT: 48.4% |
63.3%±31.7 VT: 48.4% |
| Tunbridge and Reading are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 14.4%Highest VT: 10.1% |
5.6%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
8.4% VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 84.2% VT: 73.2% |
71.9%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
84.9%Highest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1981 5 yrs newer than VT |
1982Highest 6 yrs newer than VT |
1969Lowest 7 yrs older than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 31 min 31% above VT |
20 minLowest 14% below VT |
33 minHighest 41% above VT |
| Work from home | 25.8%±8.2Highest VT: 16.9% |
21.3%±5.2Lowest VT: 16.9% |
22.9%±10.6 VT: 16.9% |
| Tunbridge and Reading are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| School district | First Branch Unified School District #82 | Ludlow Mt. Holly Unified Union School District #83 | Mountain Views Unified Union School District #76 |
| High school in town | None in town | None in town | None in town |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.