Compare towns
Tuftonboro vs Warner vs Wolfeboro
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against New Hampshire.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Tuftonboro has the most homeowners (92.6%).
Warner has the most affordable homes ($353k median).
Wolfeboro has the most people working from home (22.9%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Tuftonboro | Warner | Wolfeboro |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 2,569Lowest |
2,959 |
6,571Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +3.4% NH: +4.6% |
+3.7%Highest NH: +4.6% |
+2.3%Lowest NH: +4.6% |
| Median age | 51.9±7.5 20% above NH |
43.7±4Lowest about the NH average |
57±1.8Highest 32% above NH |
| Wolfeboro and Tuftonboro are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 18.2%±4.7Highest NH: 18.2% |
17.3%±3.3 NH: 18.2% |
13.7%±3.3Lowest NH: 18.2% |
| Tuftonboro and Warner are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 27.8%±6.9 NH: 20.1% |
20.4%±3.5Lowest NH: 20.1% |
34.6%±5.2Highest NH: 20.1% |
| Wolfeboro and Tuftonboro are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 37.6%Lowest NH: 40.6% |
42.4% NH: 40.6% |
45%Highest NH: 40.6% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 0.8%±0.8Lowest NH: 6% |
5.3%±1.6Highest NH: 6% |
2.8%±1.8 NH: 6% |
| Warner and Wolfeboro are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $100,574±$16kHighest about the NH average |
$94,022±$18kLowest 5% below NH |
$94,375±$22k 5% below NH |
| Tuftonboro and Wolfeboro are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $462,300±$46k 15% above NH |
$353,100±$22kLowest 12% below NH |
$546,500±$60kHighest 36% above NH |
| Wolfeboro and Tuftonboro are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,311±$358Highest 12% below NH |
$1,219±$123 18% below NH |
$1,103±$76Lowest 26% below NH |
| Tuftonboro and Warner are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $3,004Lowest 55% below NH |
$7,650Highest 15% above NH |
$4,531 32% below NH |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 6.5%±28.5Lowest NH: 48.2% |
48.7%±21.3Highest NH: 48.2% |
12%±11.6 NH: 48.2% |
| Below poverty line | 4%Lowest NH: 7.2% |
8.4%Highest NH: 7.2% |
8.2% NH: 7.2% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 92.6%Highest NH: 72.8% |
74.6%Lowest NH: 72.8% |
78.1% NH: 72.8% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1976 3 yrs older than NH |
1975Lowest 4 yrs older than NH |
1982Highest 3 yrs newer than NH |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 30 min 12% above NH |
32 minHighest 19% above NH |
24 minLowest 11% below NH |
| Work from home | 14.3%±8.9Lowest NH: 16.8% |
16.6%±4.8 NH: 16.8% |
22.9%±6.6Highest NH: 16.8% |
| Wolfeboro and Warner are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | — | — | #46 of 120 in NH |
| School district | Governor Wentworth Regional School District | Kearsarge Regional School District | Governor Wentworth Regional School District |
| High school in town | None in town | None in town | Kingswood Regional High School |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | — | 11.1 |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | None yet |
NH average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.