Compare towns
Topsham vs Windsor vs Washington
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Topsham has grown the fastest since 2010 (+2.2%).
Windsor has the most renters (42.2% rent).
Washington has the oldest population (median age 52.9).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Topsham | Windsor | Washington |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 999Lowest |
3,554Highest |
1,056 |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +2.2%Highest VT: +2.8% |
+0.2% VT: +2.8% |
-0.7%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 50.1±5.9 16% above VT |
44.8±6.5Lowest 4% above VT |
52.9±5.1Highest 23% above VT |
| Washington and Topsham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 18%±3.4 VT: 17.9% |
19.5%±5.2Highest VT: 17.9% |
16.5%±4.2Lowest VT: 17.9% |
| Windsor and Topsham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 23.2%±4.8Lowest VT: 21.4% |
29.7%±6.9Highest VT: 21.4% |
24.3%±4.6 VT: 21.4% |
| Windsor and Washington are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 28.1%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
39.7%Highest VT: 43.8% |
31% VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 1.7%±1.3 VT: 7% |
0.7%±0.8Lowest VT: 7% |
2.7%±2Highest VT: 7% |
| Washington and Topsham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $72,308±$60kHighest 11% below VT |
$52,484±$11kLowest 35% below VT |
$66,103±$8k 19% below VT |
| Topsham and Washington are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $222,900±$56kHighest 30% below VT |
$207,500±$31kLowest 34% below VT |
$217,700±$37k 31% below VT |
| Topsham and Washington are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $908±$398Lowest 26% below VT |
$1,026±$89Highest 17% below VT |
$996±$285 19% below VT |
| Windsor and Washington are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $4,006 21% below VT |
$5,209Highest 3% above VT |
$3,485Lowest 31% below VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 91.9%±28.3Highest VT: 48.4% |
31.5%±17Lowest VT: 48.4% |
34.5%±63.6 VT: 48.4% |
| Topsham and Washington are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 18.8%Highest VT: 10.1% |
7.8% VT: 10.1% |
3.2%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 90.3% VT: 73.2% |
57.8%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
94.4%Highest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1981Highest 5 yrs newer than VT |
1945Lowest 31 yrs older than VT |
1980 4 yrs newer than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 35 minHighest 49% above VT |
23 minLowest 3% below VT |
31 min 31% above VT |
| Work from home | 14.2%±5.8 VT: 16.9% |
10.3%±5Lowest VT: 16.9% |
14.9%±5.7Highest VT: 16.9% |
| Washington and Topsham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | — | #61 of 70 in VT | — |
| School district | Waits River Union High District #36 | — | Echo Valley Community Union School District #67 |
| High school in town | None in town | — | None in town |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | 12 photos → | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.