Compare towns
Thurman vs Enosburgh vs Johnsburg
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Thurman has the most people working from home (19%).
Enosburgh has the most kids (21% under 18).
Johnsburg has the shortest commute (26 min average).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Thurman | Enosburgh | Johnsburg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 977Lowest |
2,804Highest |
1,786 |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -10.2%Highest U.S.: +7.4% |
— | -10.5%Lowest U.S.: +7.4% |
| Median age | 52.7±3.8 35% above U.S. |
40.6±3.9Lowest 4% above U.S. |
56.2±5.8Highest 44% above U.S. |
| Johnsburg and Thurman are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 16.8%±4 U.S.: 22% |
21%±4.2Highest U.S.: 22% |
13.4%±4.1Lowest U.S.: 22% |
| Enosburgh and Thurman are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 28.8%±3.7 U.S.: 17.2% |
17.9%±3.3Lowest U.S.: 17.2% |
29.7%±4.5Highest U.S.: 17.2% |
| Johnsburg and Thurman are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 24.1% U.S.: 35.7% |
20.1%Lowest U.S.: 35.7% |
36.6%Highest U.S.: 35.7% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 1.7%±2.5Lowest U.S.: 6.4% |
5.4%±2.4Highest U.S.: 6.4% |
2.9%±2.8 U.S.: 6.4% |
| Enosburgh and Johnsburg are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $58,750±$14kLowest 27% below U.S. |
$63,828±$17kHighest 21% below U.S. |
$60,987±$8k 24% below U.S. |
| Enosburgh and Johnsburg are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $197,400±$43kLowest 41% below U.S. |
$223,100±$39kHighest 33% below U.S. |
$215,600±$41k 35% below U.S. |
| Enosburgh and Johnsburg are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $2,175±$599Highest 54% above U.S. |
$852±$87Lowest 40% below U.S. |
$942±$94 33% below U.S. |
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $2,368Lowest 24% below U.S. |
$3,624Highest 16% above U.S. |
$2,973 5% below U.S. |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 23.1%±77.8Lowest U.S.: 51.1% |
48.9%±11.2Highest U.S.: 51.1% |
31.5%±19.1 U.S.: 51.1% |
| Enosburgh and Johnsburg are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 19.2%Highest U.S.: 12.5% |
13.9% U.S.: 12.5% |
10.5%Lowest U.S.: 12.5% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 92.1%Highest U.S.: 65.2% |
75.7%Lowest U.S.: 65.2% |
82% U.S.: 65.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1985Highest 5 yrs newer than U.S. |
1972Lowest 8 yrs older than U.S. |
1978 2 yrs older than U.S. |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 33 minHighest 24% above U.S. |
32 min 21% above U.S. |
26 minLowest about the U.S. average |
| Work from home | 19%±8.1Highest U.S.: 15.1% |
10.1%±4.4Lowest U.S.: 15.1% |
16.7%±16.8 U.S.: 15.1% |
| Thurman and Johnsburg are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | — | #26 of 70 in VT | — |
| School district | — | Enosburgh-Richford Unified Union School District #88 | — |
| High school in town | — | Enosburg Falls Middle/High School | — |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | 10.4 |
— |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.