Compare towns
Tamworth vs Warner vs Windsor
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Tamworth has the most kids (23.3% under 18).
Warner has the highest household income ($94k).
Windsor has the most affordable homes ($170k median).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Tamworth | Warner | Windsor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 2,884 |
2,959Highest |
2,060Lowest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -1.5%Lowest U.S.: +7.4% |
+3.7%Highest U.S.: +7.4% |
+3.5% U.S.: +7.4% |
| Median age | 45.6±10.9Highest 17% above U.S. |
43.7±4Lowest 12% above U.S. |
44.6±12.3 15% above U.S. |
| Tamworth and Windsor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 23.3%±6.5Highest U.S.: 22% |
17.3%±3.3Lowest U.S.: 22% |
21.1%±8.8 U.S.: 22% |
| Tamworth and Windsor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 28.2%±7 U.S.: 17.2% |
20.4%±3.5Lowest U.S.: 17.2% |
29.2%±8Highest U.S.: 17.2% |
| Windsor and Tamworth are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 33.9%Lowest U.S.: 35.7% |
42.4%Highest U.S.: 35.7% |
40% U.S.: 35.7% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 0.4%±0.7Lowest U.S.: 6.4% |
5.3%±1.6Highest U.S.: 6.4% |
1.2%±1.4 U.S.: 6.4% |
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $68,036±$20k 16% below U.S. |
$94,022±$18kHighest 16% above U.S. |
$51,197±$4kLowest 37% below U.S. |
| Warner and Tamworth are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $366,800±$29kHighest 10% above U.S. |
$353,100±$22k 6% above U.S. |
$170,300±$22kLowest 49% below U.S. |
| Tamworth and Warner are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,110±$184 21% below U.S. |
$1,219±$123Highest 14% below U.S. |
$1,002±$107Lowest 29% below U.S. |
| Warner and Tamworth are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $4,474Lowest 43% above U.S. |
$7,650Highest 145% above U.S. |
$4,878 56% above U.S. |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 43.6%±31.1 U.S.: 51.1% |
48.7%±21.3Highest U.S.: 51.1% |
31.4%±20Lowest U.S.: 51.1% |
| Warner and Tamworth are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 9.2%Highest U.S.: 12.5% |
8.4% U.S.: 12.5% |
7.8%Lowest U.S.: 12.5% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 74% U.S.: 65.2% |
74.6%Highest U.S.: 65.2% |
51.6%Lowest U.S.: 65.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1975Highest 5 yrs older than U.S. |
1975Highest 5 yrs older than U.S. |
1938Lowest 42 yrs older than U.S. |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 22 min 15% below U.S. |
32 minHighest 20% above U.S. |
22 minLowest 16% below U.S. |
| Work from home | 16.4%±11.3 U.S.: 15.1% |
16.6%±4.8Highest U.S.: 15.1% |
6.6%±4.7Lowest U.S.: 15.1% |
| Warner and Tamworth are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #101 of 120 in NH | — | #61 of 70 in VT |
| School district | Tamworth School District | Kearsarge Regional School District | — |
| High school in town | None in town | None in town | — |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.