Compare towns
Sutton vs Epping vs Greenland
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against New Hampshire.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Sutton has the most affordable homes ($363k median).
Epping has the most renters (13.7% rent).
Greenland has the most expensive homes ($663k median).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Sutton | Epping | Greenland |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 2,239Lowest |
7,430Highest |
4,106 |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +7.7%Lowest NH: +4.6% |
+11.1% NH: +4.6% |
+14.6%Highest NH: +4.6% |
| Median age | 48.1±4.1 11% above NH |
45.1±3.5Lowest 4% above NH |
48.4±7.7Highest 12% above NH |
| Greenland and Sutton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 20.5%±3.8Highest NH: 18.2% |
18.7%±4.8Lowest NH: 18.2% |
19.8%±5.2 NH: 18.2% |
| Sutton and Greenland are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 21.6%±5.9Lowest NH: 20.1% |
22.6%±5.2 NH: 20.1% |
28.9%±5Highest NH: 20.1% |
| Greenland and Epping are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 44.3% NH: 40.6% |
37%Lowest NH: 40.6% |
59.6%Highest NH: 40.6% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 4.9%±3.6 NH: 6% |
5.1%±3.3Highest NH: 6% |
2.3%±1.6Lowest NH: 6% |
| Epping and Sutton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $130,313±$31k 32% above NH |
$104,220±$7kLowest 5% above NH |
$162,837±$11kHighest 64% above NH |
| Greenland and Sutton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $362,600±$16kLowest 10% below NH |
$436,900±$35k 9% above NH |
$662,800±$42kHighest 65% above NH |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,656±$614Lowest 11% above NH |
$1,742±$576 17% above NH |
$2,331±$363Highest 56% above NH |
| Greenland and Epping are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $7,652Highest 15% above NH |
$6,936Lowest 4% above NH |
$7,420 11% above NH |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 27.6%±47.2Lowest NH: 48.2% |
67.8%±25.9 NH: 48.2% |
77.3%±44.3Highest NH: 48.2% |
| Greenland and Epping are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 4.8%Highest NH: 7.2% |
4.7% NH: 7.2% |
0.5%Lowest NH: 7.2% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 95.7%Highest NH: 72.8% |
86.3%Lowest NH: 72.8% |
93.3% NH: 72.8% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1971Lowest 8 yrs older than NH |
1989Highest 10 yrs newer than NH |
1987 8 yrs newer than NH |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 29 min 10% above NH |
32 minHighest 21% above NH |
21 minLowest 23% below NH |
| Work from home | 14.8%±5.6Lowest NH: 16.8% |
24%±6.9 NH: 16.8% |
32.2%±7.7Highest NH: 16.8% |
| Greenland and Epping are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | — | #77 of 120 in NH | #10 of 120 in NH |
| School district | Kearsarge Regional School District | Epping School District | Greenland School District |
| High school in town | Kearsarge Regional High School | Epping High School | None in town |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 10.4Highest |
9.3Lowest |
— |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | None yet |
NH average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.