Compare towns
Sugar Hill vs Nottingham
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against New Hampshire.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Sugar Hill has grown the fastest since 2010 (+14.9%).
Nottingham has the most kids (23.9% under 18).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Sugar Hill | Nottingham |
|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | ||
| People | ||
| Population | 658Lowest |
5,357Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +14.9%Highest NH: +4.6% |
+9.3%Lowest NH: +4.6% |
| Median age | 60.8±2.1Highest 40% above NH |
38.8±6.7Lowest 10% below NH |
| Kids under 18 | 10.3%±3.5Lowest NH: 18.2% |
23.9%±5.4Highest NH: 18.2% |
| Age 65+ | 37.2%±12.7Highest NH: 20.1% |
18.4%±4.2Lowest NH: 20.1% |
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 59%Highest NH: 40.6% |
40.9%Lowest NH: 40.6% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 2%±3.1Lowest NH: 6% |
5.9%±2.6Highest NH: 6% |
| Nottingham and Sugar Hill are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Cost of living | ||
| Household incomemedian | $154,091±$32kHighest 56% above NH |
$122,201±$20kLowest 23% above NH |
| Sugar Hill and Nottingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $639,700±$50kHighest 59% above NH |
$457,500±$26kLowest 14% above NH |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,208±$630Lowest 19% below NH |
$2,068±$1kHighest 39% above NH |
| Nottingham and Sugar Hill are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $7,340Highest 10% above NH |
$7,319Lowest 10% above NH |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 40%±100Lowest NH: 48.2% |
92.1%±44.9Highest NH: 48.2% |
| Nottingham and Sugar Hill are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Below poverty line | 0.9%Lowest NH: 7.2% |
1.4%Highest NH: 7.2% |
| Housing | ||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 95.4%Highest NH: 72.8% |
94.3%Lowest NH: 72.8% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1964Lowest 15 yrs older than NH |
1992Highest 13 yrs newer than NH |
| Getting to work | ||
| Average commuteone way | 26 minLowest about the NH average |
34 minHighest 27% above NH |
| Work from home | 16.8%±4.8Lowest NH: 16.8% |
22.2%±5.8Highest NH: 16.8% |
| Nottingham and Sugar Hill are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Schools | ||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | — | #15 of 120 in NH |
| School district | — | Nottingham School District |
| High school in town | — | None in town |
| On TownTapestry | ||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet |
NH average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.

