Compare towns
Sturbridge vs Killingly vs Windsor
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Sturbridge has the most expensive homes ($426k median).
Killingly has the most renters (28.4% rent).
Windsor has the shortest commute (21 min average).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Sturbridge | Killingly | Windsor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 9,960Lowest |
17,867 |
29,468Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +6.5% U.S.: +7.4% |
— | — |
| Median age | 47.2±2.6Highest 21% above U.S. |
39.5±3Lowest about the U.S. average |
43.7±1.9 12% above U.S. |
| Sturbridge and Windsor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 20.7%±3Highest U.S.: 22% |
19.8%±2.3 U.S.: 22% |
19.2%±2.1Lowest U.S.: 22% |
| Sturbridge and Killingly are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 19.8%±3 U.S.: 17.2% |
19.7%±2.4Lowest U.S.: 17.2% |
20%±2Highest U.S.: 17.2% |
| Windsor and Sturbridge are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 49.3%Highest U.S.: 35.7% |
22.9%Lowest U.S.: 35.7% |
43.2% U.S.: 35.7% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 4.6%±1.5Lowest U.S.: 6.4% |
5.4%±1.9 U.S.: 6.4% |
5.9%±1.3Highest U.S.: 6.4% |
| Windsor and Killingly are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $136,759±$15kHighest 69% above U.S. |
$84,350±$8kLowest 4% above U.S. |
$104,725±$8k 30% above U.S. |
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $425,800±$18kHighest 28% above U.S. |
$288,600±$15kLowest 13% below U.S. |
$305,200±$11k 8% below U.S. |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,193±$398 16% below U.S. |
$1,044±$141Lowest 26% below U.S. |
$1,681±$62Highest 19% above U.S. |
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $6,520Highest 109% above U.S. |
$3,922Lowest 26% above U.S. |
$5,351 72% above U.S. |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 42%±17.7Lowest U.S.: 51.1% |
42.8%±10.9 U.S.: 51.1% |
44.9%±10.9Highest U.S.: 51.1% |
| Windsor and Killingly are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 3.7%Lowest U.S.: 12.5% |
11.4%Highest U.S.: 12.5% |
6.7% U.S.: 12.5% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 86.3%Highest U.S.: 65.2% |
71.6%Lowest U.S.: 65.2% |
82.4% U.S.: 65.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1982Highest 2 yrs newer than U.S. |
1968Lowest 12 yrs older than U.S. |
1970 10 yrs older than U.S. |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 38 minHighest 43% above U.S. |
28 min 6% above U.S. |
21 minLowest 19% below U.S. |
| Work from home | 19.8%±4.8Highest U.S.: 15.1% |
11.1%±2.3Lowest U.S.: 15.1% |
16.1%±3.2 U.S.: 15.1% |
| Sturbridge and Windsor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #89 of 282 in MA | #136 of 149 in CT | #117 of 149 in CT |
| School district | Sturbridge · Tantasqua | Connecticut Technical Education and Career System · Eastern Connecticut Regional Educational Service Center (EAS | Capitol Region Education Council · Windsor School District |
| High school in town | Tantasqua Regional Sr High | Killingly High School | Windsor High School |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 7.7Lowest |
11.1Highest |
10.2 |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.