Compare towns
Strong vs Hooksett vs New Vineyard
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Strong has the most people working from home (18.5%).
Hooksett has grown the fastest since 2010 (+10.6%).
New Vineyard has the most kids (24.5% under 18).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Strong | Hooksett | New Vineyard |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 1,249 |
15,057Highest |
607Lowest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -7.5%Lowest U.S.: +7.4% |
+10.6%Highest U.S.: +7.4% |
-4.8% U.S.: +7.4% |
| Median age | 47.5±8.9Highest 22% above U.S. |
41.3±1.5Lowest 6% above U.S. |
47.5±9.5Highest 22% above U.S. |
| Kids under 18 | 19.5%±3.5 U.S.: 22% |
17.4%±2.9Lowest U.S.: 22% |
24.5%±6.3Highest U.S.: 22% |
| New Vineyard and Strong are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 22%±4.1 U.S.: 17.2% |
17.3%±2.4Lowest U.S.: 17.2% |
27%±3.1Highest U.S.: 17.2% |
| New Vineyard and Strong are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 26.5% U.S.: 35.7% |
39.6%Highest U.S.: 35.7% |
20%Lowest U.S.: 35.7% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 2.1%±1.6 U.S.: 6.4% |
8.9%±1.6Highest U.S.: 6.4% |
1.8%±1.4Lowest U.S.: 6.4% |
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $47,557±$10kLowest 41% below U.S. |
$117,962±$11kHighest 46% above U.S. |
$61,806±$19k 23% below U.S. |
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $183,900±$29kLowest 45% below U.S. |
$407,000±$26kHighest 22% above U.S. |
$190,000±$76k 43% below U.S. |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $920±$276Lowest 35% below U.S. |
$1,661±$206Highest 18% above U.S. |
$925±$490 35% below U.S. |
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $1,950Lowest 37% below U.S. |
$6,554Highest 110% above U.S. |
$2,136 32% below U.S. |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 20.9%±52.4Lowest U.S.: 51.1% |
41.7%±16.4 U.S.: 51.1% |
66.7%±5.3Highest U.S.: 51.1% |
| Below poverty line | 13.9% U.S.: 12.5% |
3.3%Lowest U.S.: 12.5% |
22.6%Highest U.S.: 12.5% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 84.6% U.S.: 65.2% |
80.6%Lowest U.S.: 65.2% |
90.7%Highest U.S.: 65.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1971Lowest 9 yrs older than U.S. |
1988Highest 8 yrs newer than U.S. |
1987 7 yrs newer than U.S. |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 31 min 18% above U.S. |
27 minLowest about the U.S. average |
34 minHighest 30% above U.S. |
| Work from home | 18.5%±9.8Highest U.S.: 15.1% |
13.4%±3.1Lowest U.S.: 15.1% |
16.7%±8.6 U.S.: 15.1% |
| Strong and New Vineyard are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | — | #30 of 120 in NH | — |
| School district | RSU 58/MSAD 58 | Hooksett School District | — |
| High school in town | None in town | None in town | — |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.