Compare towns

Strong vs Epping vs New Vineyard vs Phillips

Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..

What stands out worked out from the figures below

Strong has the most affordable homes ($184k median).
Epping has grown the fastest since 2010 (+11.1%).
New Vineyard has the most kids (24.5% under 18).
Phillips has the shortest commute (23 min average).

What matters to you?

Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.

MeasureStrongEppingNew VineyardPhillips
People
Population
1,249
7,430Highest
607Lowest
1,094
Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census
-7.5%
U.S.: +7.4%
+11.1%Highest
U.S.: +7.4%
-4.8%
U.S.: +7.4%
-12.6%Lowest
U.S.: +7.4%
Median age
47.5±8.9
22% above U.S.
45.1±3.5Lowest
16% above U.S.
47.5±9.5
22% above U.S.
49.7±3.7Highest
28% above U.S.
Phillips and Strong are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Kids under 18
19.5%±3.5
U.S.: 22%
18.7%±4.8Lowest
U.S.: 22%
24.5%±6.3Highest
U.S.: 22%
20.7%±5.1
U.S.: 22%
New Vineyard and Phillips are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Age 65+
22%±4.1
U.S.: 17.2%
22.6%±5.2
U.S.: 17.2%
27%±3.1Highest
U.S.: 17.2%
21.3%±2.1Lowest
U.S.: 17.2%
New Vineyard and Epping are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+
26.5%
U.S.: 35.7%
37%Highest
U.S.: 35.7%
20%Lowest
U.S.: 35.7%
20.7%
U.S.: 35.7%
Enrolled in collegeshare of residents
2.1%±1.6
U.S.: 6.4%
5.1%±3.3Highest
U.S.: 6.4%
1.8%±1.4Lowest
U.S.: 6.4%
3.9%±2.6
U.S.: 6.4%
Epping and Phillips are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Cost of living
Household incomemedian
$47,557±$10k
41% below U.S.
$104,220±$7kHighest
29% above U.S.
$61,806±$19k
23% below U.S.
$45,385±$12kLowest
44% below U.S.
Home valuemedian, owner-occupied
$183,900±$29kLowest
45% below U.S.
$436,900±$35kHighest
31% above U.S.
$190,000±$76k
43% below U.S.
$190,800±$18k
43% below U.S.
Rentmedian gross, monthly
$920±$276
35% below U.S.
$1,742±$576Highest
23% above U.S.
$925±$490
35% below U.S.
$483±$377Lowest
66% below U.S.
Epping and New Vineyard are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Property taxmedian, yearly
$1,950Lowest
37% below U.S.
$6,936Highest
122% above U.S.
$2,136
32% below U.S.
$2,582
17% below U.S.
Renters paying 30%+of income on rent
20.9%±52.4Lowest
U.S.: 51.1%
67.8%±25.9Highest
U.S.: 51.1%
66.7%±5.3
U.S.: 51.1%
40.4%±33
U.S.: 51.1%
Epping and New Vineyard are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Below poverty line
13.9%
U.S.: 12.5%
4.7%Lowest
U.S.: 12.5%
22.6%Highest
U.S.: 12.5%
17.7%
U.S.: 12.5%
Housing
Homeownersof occupied homes
84.6%
U.S.: 65.2%
86.3%
U.S.: 65.2%
90.7%Highest
U.S.: 65.2%
83.3%Lowest
U.S.: 65.2%
Typical home builtmedian year
1971Lowest
9 yrs older than U.S.
1989Highest
9 yrs newer than U.S.
1987
7 yrs newer than U.S.
1974
6 yrs older than U.S.
Getting to work
Average commuteone way
31 min
18% above U.S.
32 min
22% above U.S.
34 minHighest
30% above U.S.
23 minLowest
14% below U.S.
Work from home
18.5%±9.8
U.S.: 15.1%
24%±6.9Highest
U.S.: 15.1%
16.7%±8.6Lowest
U.S.: 15.1%
16.8%±7
U.S.: 15.1%
Epping and Strong are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Schools
Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading — #77 of 120 in NH — —
School district RSU 58/MSAD 58 Epping School District — RSU 58/MSAD 58
High school in town None in town Epping High School — None in town
Students per teacherat that high school —
9.3
— —
On TownTapestry
Old photos in History None yet None yet None yet None yet

U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.