Compare towns

Sharon vs Castleton vs Cavendish vs Whitingham

Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.

What stands out worked out from the figures below

Sharon has grown the fastest since 2010 (+3.9%).
Castleton has the youngest population (median age 38.3).
Cavendish has the most people working from home (18.5%).
Whitingham has the most homeowners (85.2%).

What matters to you?

Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.

MeasureSharonCastletonCavendishWhitingham
People
Population
1,577
4,453Highest
1,242Lowest
1,368
Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census
+3.9%Highest
VT: +2.8%
-5.5%Lowest
VT: +2.8%
+1.8%
VT: +2.8%
-1%
VT: +2.8%
Median age
45.6±7.7
6% above VT
38.3±4.3Lowest
11% below VT
45.2±5.9
5% above VT
46.4±7.1Highest
8% above VT
Whitingham and Sharon are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Kids under 18
21%±5Highest
VT: 17.9%
18.8%±6.4
VT: 17.9%
18.3%±4.8Lowest
VT: 17.9%
19.8%±4.5
VT: 17.9%
Sharon and Whitingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Age 65+
25.1%±3.6
VT: 21.4%
20.7%±4.6Lowest
VT: 21.4%
23.6%±2
VT: 21.4%
31.1%±2.3Highest
VT: 21.4%
Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+
37.9%
VT: 43.8%
37.9%
VT: 43.8%
39.3%Highest
VT: 43.8%
32.8%Lowest
VT: 43.8%
Enrolled in collegeshare of residents
1.5%±0.9Lowest
VT: 7%
19.3%±1.8Highest
VT: 7%
4.3%±1.9
VT: 7%
2.2%±1.9
VT: 7%
Cost of living
Household incomemedian
$84,375±$17k
4% above VT
$73,854±$23k
9% below VT
$89,063±$29kHighest
10% above VT
$70,625±$11kLowest
13% below VT
Cavendish and Sharon are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Home valuemedian, owner-occupied
$346,700±$37kHighest
10% above VT
$224,800±$71kLowest
29% below VT
$285,100±$40k
10% below VT
$262,300±$30k
17% below VT
Sharon and Cavendish are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Rentmedian gross, monthly
$1,386±$155Highest
12% above VT
$1,137±$195
8% below VT
$1,000±$546
19% below VT
$673±$150Lowest
45% below VT
Sharon and Castleton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Property taxmedian, yearly
$5,903Highest
17% above VT
$3,167Lowest
37% below VT
$3,948
22% below VT
$5,055
about the VT average
Renters paying 30%+of income on rent
19.8%±17.9Lowest
VT: 48.4%
67.7%±21.9Highest
VT: 48.4%
28.9%±27
VT: 48.4%
62.7%±47.3
VT: 48.4%
Castleton and Whitingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Below poverty line
3%Lowest
VT: 10.1%
12.5%
VT: 10.1%
6.3%
VT: 10.1%
15.5%Highest
VT: 10.1%
Housing
Homeownersof occupied homes
79.7%
VT: 73.2%
79%Lowest
VT: 73.2%
81.3%
VT: 73.2%
85.2%Highest
VT: 73.2%
Typical home builtmedian year
1981Highest
5 yrs newer than VT
1974
2 yrs older than VT
1968Lowest
8 yrs older than VT
1974
2 yrs older than VT
Getting to work
Average commuteone way
26 min
12% above VT
19 min
17% below VT
19 minLowest
21% below VT
38 minHighest
62% above VT
Work from home
12.7%±3.7
VT: 16.9%
6.2%±3.9Lowest
VT: 16.9%
18.5%±6.6Highest
VT: 16.9%
9.7%±5.2
VT: 16.9%
Cavendish and Sharon are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Schools
Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading — #39 of 70 in VT — —
School district Sharon School District Slate Valley Unified Union School District #62 Green Mountain Unified School District #77 Twin Valley Unified School District #75
High school in town None in town None in town None in town Twin Valley Middle High School
Students per teacherat that high school — — —
7.8
On TownTapestry
Old photos in History None yet None yet 12 photos → None yet

VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.