Compare towns
Sharon vs Windsor Locks vs Salisbury
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Connecticut.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Sharon has the oldest population (median age 59.5).
Windsor Locks has the most affordable homes ($259k median).
Salisbury has the most people working from home (28%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Sharon | Windsor Locks | Salisbury |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 2,723Lowest |
12,579Highest |
4,224 |
| Median age | 59.5±6Highest 45% above CT |
41.4±2.6Lowest about the CT average |
44.2±9.9 8% above CT |
| Sharon and Salisbury are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 7.2%±3.2Lowest CT: 20.2% |
18.6%±3.4 CT: 20.2% |
19.2%±6.9Highest CT: 20.2% |
| Salisbury and Windsor Locks are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 37.9%±9.3Highest CT: 18.5% |
18.2%±2.7Lowest CT: 18.5% |
28.1%±5.1 CT: 18.5% |
| Sharon and Salisbury are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 56.8% CT: 42.5% |
28.6%Lowest CT: 42.5% |
58.8%Highest CT: 42.5% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 3.5%±2.5 CT: 7.1% |
5.9%±1.8Highest CT: 7.1% |
2.9%±2.1Lowest CT: 7.1% |
| Windsor Locks and Sharon are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $100,518±$15k 5% above CT |
$81,205±$13kLowest 15% below CT |
$124,256±$26kHighest 30% above CT |
| Salisbury and Sharon are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $590,700±$156k 61% above CT |
$258,800±$14kLowest 29% below CT |
$763,700±$121kHighest 108% above CT |
| Salisbury and Sharon are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,750±$1k 18% above CT |
$1,394±$187Lowest 6% below CT |
$1,846±$736Highest 24% above CT |
| Salisbury and Sharon are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $4,484 33% below CT |
$3,688Lowest 44% below CT |
$5,125Highest 23% below CT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 64%±16.2Highest CT: 52.6% |
58.2%±16.8 CT: 52.6% |
23.2%±11.8Lowest CT: 52.6% |
| Sharon and Windsor Locks are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 10.8% CT: 10% |
10.9%Highest CT: 10% |
4.2%Lowest CT: 10% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 72.5% CT: 66.5% |
77.1%Highest CT: 66.5% |
68.2%Lowest CT: 66.5% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1954Lowest 13 yrs older than CT |
1961 6 yrs older than CT |
1967Highest same as CT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 30 minHighest 13% above CT |
22 min 17% below CT |
20 minLowest 25% below CT |
| Work from home | 18.7%±6.8 CT: 16% |
17.7%±3.7Lowest CT: 16% |
28%±8Highest CT: 16% |
| Salisbury and Sharon are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | — | #109 of 149 in CT | #19 of 149 in CT |
| School district | Sharon School District | Windsor Locks School District | Salisbury School District |
| High school in town | None in town | Windsor Locks High School | None in town |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | 8.9 |
— |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
CT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.