Compare towns

Salisbury vs Randolph vs Ripton vs Leicester

Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.

What stands out worked out from the figures below

Salisbury has the shortest commute (19 min average).
Randolph has the most renters (32.8% rent).
Ripton has grown the fastest since 2010 (+25.7%).

What matters to you?

Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.

MeasureSalisburyRandolphRiptonLeicester
People
Population
1,200
4,843Highest
508Lowest
1,026
Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census
+7.5%
VT: +2.8%
-0.1%
VT: +2.8%
+25.7%Highest
VT: +2.8%
-10%Lowest
VT: +2.8%
Median age
50.6±6.5Highest
17% above VT
40.4±7.4Lowest
6% below VT
47.7±14.2
11% above VT
48.8±3.8
13% above VT
Salisbury and Leicester are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Kids under 18
16.6%±3.2
VT: 17.9%
17.3%±4.4Highest
VT: 17.9%
11.8%±6.3Lowest
VT: 17.9%
14.9%±5.1
VT: 17.9%
Randolph and Salisbury are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Age 65+
30.4%±2.9
VT: 21.4%
22.9%±4.2Lowest
VT: 21.4%
30.5%±7.1Highest
VT: 21.4%
24.5%±6.7
VT: 21.4%
Ripton and Salisbury are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+
34.6%Lowest
VT: 43.8%
40.8%
VT: 43.8%
48%Highest
VT: 43.8%
35.9%
VT: 43.8%
Enrolled in collegeshare of residents
1.6%±1.1
VT: 7%
11.2%±2.5
VT: 7%
20.1%±6.3Highest
VT: 7%
1.3%±1.6Lowest
VT: 7%
Cost of living
Household incomemedian
$99,688±$21k
23% above VT
$76,758±$6k
5% below VT
$112,917±$15kHighest
39% above VT
$70,417±$30kLowest
13% below VT
Ripton and Salisbury are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Home valuemedian, owner-occupied
$306,900±$51k
3% below VT
$278,700±$38kLowest
12% below VT
$394,400±$61kHighest
25% above VT
$309,700±$107k
about the VT average
Ripton and Leicester are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Rentmedian gross, monthly
$1,443±$984Highest
17% above VT
$1,172±$173
5% below VT
—
$1,098±$300Lowest
11% below VT
Salisbury and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Property taxmedian, yearly
$4,842
4% below VT
$4,698
7% below VT
$4,915Highest
about the VT average
$3,822Lowest
24% below VT
Renters paying 30%+of income on rent
31.9%±22.6Lowest
VT: 48.4%
54.1%±17.8Highest
VT: 48.4%
52.9%±100
VT: 48.4%
33.3%±40.4
VT: 48.4%
Randolph and Ripton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Below poverty line
4.6%Lowest
VT: 10.1%
7.7%
VT: 10.1%
8.6%
VT: 10.1%
11.8%Highest
VT: 10.1%
Housing
Homeownersof occupied homes
88.7%
VT: 73.2%
67.2%Lowest
VT: 73.2%
90.9%Highest
VT: 73.2%
85.5%
VT: 73.2%
Typical home builtmedian year
1967Lowest
9 yrs older than VT
1971
5 yrs older than VT
1973
3 yrs older than VT
1981Highest
5 yrs newer than VT
Getting to work
Average commuteone way
19 minLowest
20% below VT
21 min
12% below VT
24 min
about the VT average
28 minHighest
20% above VT
Work from home
6%±2.2Lowest
VT: 16.9%
12.9%±4.7
VT: 16.9%
17.2%±8.7Highest
VT: 16.9%
12.7%±5.9
VT: 16.9%
Ripton and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Schools
Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading — #55 of 70 in VT — —
School district Addison Central Unified Union School District #55 Orange Southwest Unified Union School District #59 Addison Central Unified Union School District #55 —
High school in town None in town Randolph Union High School None in town —
Students per teacherat that high school —
9.4
— —
On TownTapestry
Old photos in History None yet None yet None yet None yet

VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.